If there is the slightest possibility of God existing and that He has sent His only begotten Son Jesus to be your savior from your transgressions, wouldn’t it be wise to investigate it for yourself?
Let’s look at two quotes from Richard Dawkins and examine them for their factual content and for their coherent merit.
First quote: “The fact that life evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing, is a fact so staggering that I would be mad to attempt words to do it justice.”
First off, Richard Dawkins implies that it is a “fact” that “live evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing” which broken down shows that Richard Dawkins says everything around us, universe, earth, you, and me, etc. came “out of literally nothing.”
Have you ever seen anything create itself from nothing? Just how long do you think it takes nothing to become something other than nothing performed all by nothing?
Do you know what nothing is? Nothing is the sort of thing rocks dream about. Nothing, no time, no anything, just nothing at all.
Can you do simple math? Zero plus Zero equal Zero; Nothing plus Nothing equal Nothing; Nothing times Nothing plus Nothing equal Nothing.
At what point does nothing become not nothing on its own? How many times nothing does it take for nothing plus nothing times nothing to become something?
Have you ever sat down and rationally thought through the validity of the universe and life coming from nothing with nothing causing everything to exist?
Second quote: “The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.”
It takes the meme for blind faith to believe everything came from nothing by nothing at all.
Richard Dawkins. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved May 6, 2011, from BrainyQuote.com Web site: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/richarddaw402494.html
Many atheists claim that God does not exist and as such they choose to not know who God really is. In their ignoring reality, making claims such as the universe created itself out of nothing; atheists try to make themselves feel better by making up gods to which they know do not exist while ignoring the one real and true God of the Holy Bible who has revealed Himself through the order and design of all of nature and universe.
To know who God is, we need to understand the attributes of God to get an understanding of who God is. Below are the known attributes of God.
SELF-EXISTENT: God has no cause; He does not depend on anything for his continued existence.
TRANSCENDENT: God is entirely distinct from the universe, as the carpenter is distinct from the bench; excluding pantheism (God in all) and animism (everything is a god).
IMMANENT: Though transcendent, God is present with and in the world; excluding deism (God is out there but not here).
IMMUTABLE: God is perfect in that He never changes nor can He change with respect to His being, attributes, purpose, or promises; excluding process theology, Mormon doctrine of eternal progression.
ETERNAL: God is perfect in that He transcends all time and temporal limitations, and is thus infinite with respect to time.
OMNIPRESENT: God is perfect in that He transcends all space and spatial limitations, and is thus infinite with respect to space, with His whole Being filling every part of the universe and being present everywhere (not diffused through the universe, but present at each point in His fullness).
OMNIPOTENT: God is perfect in that He can do all things consistent with the perfection of His being. God cannot do the self-contradictory (e.g., make a rock He cannot lift), nor can He do that which is contrary to His perfect nature (e.g., He cannot change, He cannot lie, etc.).
OMNISCIENT: God is perfect in that He knows all things, including events before they happen.
INCORPOREAL: God has no body or parts, and is immaterial, being a simple and infinite being of spirit; excluding the Mormon doctrine of God as an exalted man.
ONE: God is a perfectly unique and simple being, existing as one infinite Being called God. There is therefore only one God, who is called Yahweh in the Old Testament, and who reveals Himself in the persons of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit in the New Testament; thus excluding polytheism, tritheism (belief in three gods), and subordinationism (in which Christ is a lesser god subordinate to the Almighty God).
CREATOR: God is the One through whom all things have come into existence; by His unbounded power and knowledge He created finite existence ex nihilo and formed the universe as it now is.
PERSONAL: God, as the author of personhood in the created universe, cannot be less than personal Himself; thus He experiences relationships with other persons, or self-conscious beings. Note that God may be more than personal, indeed, His infinite nature suggests that He must be.
INCOMPREHENSIBLE: God is incomprehensible, not in the sense that the concept of God is unintelligible, but in the sense that God cannot be fully and directly known by finite creatures, because of His uniqueness and His infinitude.
MORALLY PERFECT: The following are the moral attributes of God; they are listed here together because God's moral nature is perfectly unified, with no tension between His wrath and His love, for example.
a. GOOD: God is morally excellent, and does only good
b. HOLY: God is morally transcendent, utterly separated from all evil, and perfectly pure
c. RIGHTEOUS: God is perfectly moral in all that He does, doing everything right
d. TRUE: God is perfectly truthful, and cannot lie
e. LOVING: God's moral character is pure love, sacrificial giving for the true benefit of another
f. WRATHFUL: God's moral perfection requires Him to show displeasure against anything which seeks to act contrary to its moral purpose, to judge that which rebels against His authority as Creator and Lord
To say that “God is omnipotent” means that His power is limitless, and, thus, God is capable of doing anything that is logically possible. This does not mean that God can do things that are absurd or irrational. It is absurd and irrational to think that God could create Himself because as we see from God’s attributes, God is not created.
In fact, the Bible is very clear that there are certain things God cannot do: He cannot lie (Titus 1:2) and He cannot deny Himself (2 Timothy 2:13). This is not because He lacks the power, but because He is true to His own nature. So, there is no contradiction in saying that God is all powerful (He can do anything that is logically possible), and yet He cannot do things that are logically impossible.
In fact, apart from the biblical God, we would have no reason to believe that contradictions are always wrong because the law of non-contradiction itself stems from the nature of God. All truth is in God (John 14:6; Colossians 2:3), and God cannot deny Himself (2 Timothy 2:13). Thus, truth will not go against itself; it will not contradict. Apart from the biblical God, there would be no reason for the law of non-contradiction—or any law of logic.
Now you know the attributes of God as described in the Holy Bible and revealed through the order and design of all of nature and universe.
This article and corresponding video are not all encompassing; meaning they were done to get you to think for yourself and to not take anyone’s word for something and to hopefully entice you to actually do your own research on these topics. I suggest you (in fact dare you to) actually do your own straightforward honest research on these topics and not just jump to your preconceived notion about what these topics are from what you’ve been told by anyone; even me. I challenge you to honestly answer the twenty five questions at the end of this article and video. Also, at the end is a tidbit of historical background information you most likely didn’t know about natural selection.
Summary
Most students in evolutionary-biased education come to believe that mutations and natural selection result in one kind of creature changing into a totally different kind over long periods of time. However, seldom, if ever is the fact presented that for Darwinian Evolution to occur it is necessary for new genetic information to be added to a creature. To date, no example of completely new additional information from a naturally occurring mutation or selection has been observed. The diversity of species in, for example, dogs, cats and horses, has arisen because of their already-existing genetic information, acted upon by natural selection and mutations.(1)
Information
DNA is all around us. It is found in every plant and animal. You literally eat it at every meal. It is possible to extract pieces of DNA, consisting of billions of basic units (called “bases,” abbreviated as A, C, T, and G), with just a common onion and a few household chemicals.
It is amazing what you can hold in your hand. Each DNA strand is an extremely long molecule. While humans have about 3 billion bases in their DNA, the garden onion (Allium cepa) has 15 billion bases. If the DNA in a single human cell were stretched out it would be 6 feet (1.8 m) long, so imagine how long the DNA from an onion cell would be!
The DNA molecule is often compared to a book. The DNA bases (A, C, T, and G) form words called genes. The genes contain all sorts of information necessary for life. DNA is found in every living cell (at least that we know of). It is like a recipe book providing information for building and running the organism. Because each organism needs different information, the arrangement of DNA varies in each individual. Human DNA must contain information to make brains and eyeballs, while plant DNA provides information to make leaves and roots (such as onions). (6)
What’s Not Evolution?
Darwinism: all life on earth has come about through descent with modification from a single common ancestor (a hypothetical, primitive, single-celled organism).
Darwinism and Darwin Evolution used in correct context is defined as meaning “descent with modification from a common ancestor” or in other words (molecules-to-man evolution). Darwinism has never been observed.
What is Evolution?
The terms evolving and evolution used in correct context is defined as meaning “adaptation” or “limited change in a population over time” which can be clearly seen today in everyday life as we observe nature and when observing bacterium, fruit flies, different breeds of dogs, cats, horses, etc. All of these forms of life can change and have changed yet they only change within their form of life meaning that bacterium will always be bacterium and fruit flies will always be flies and dogs will always be dogs, etc. You can see this in dogs the so many different breeds of dogs. Take for example a pure Labrador and Poodle. You can breed two pure Labradors together and get pure Labradors and the same with two pure Poodles and get pure Poodles. You can breed a pure Labrador and Poodle together (and just why anyone would want to do this is beyond me) and get a 50% Labrador and 50% Poodle yet this 50/50 mix is still a dog no matter how many times it is done nor for however many years it is done.
Natural Selection
Evolution (not Darwinism) in the wild happens by natural selection. Natural selection is an observable process and has been shown to change organisms but always within the boundaries of the created kinds, i.e., dogs, cats, bacterium, flies, etc. This type of change is often termed “microevolution,” and the hypothetical type of change (Darwinism) that turns fish into philosophers is known as “macroevolution.” The large-scale changes through time are simply dramatic extrapolations of the observed phenomenon of natural selection. This degree of extrapolation has no basis in operational science. There are limits to the amount and type of genetic change that can occur—no matter what amount of time is allowed. As an illustration: if you can pedal a bicycle at 10 mph, how long would it take to reach the moon? Bicycles have limits that would make this goal impossible regardless of the time you have to accomplish it.(4)
Mutations
In the real world, mutations are responsible for a number of genetic defects, including hemophilia (bleeders’ disease), loss of protective color in the skin and eyes (albinism), and certain kinds of cancer and brain malfunction. We have abundant evidence that various kinds of radiations, errors in DNA replication, and certain chemicals can indeed produce mutations, and mutations in reproductive cells can be passed on to future generations. Mutations are certainly real. They have profound effects on our lives. And, according to the Darwinists, mutations are the raw material for Darwinism.
But is that possible? Can mutations produce real evolutionary changes? Don’t make any mistakes here. Mutations are real; they’re something we observe; they do make changes in traits. But the question remains: do they produce evolutionary changes? Do they really produce new traits? Do they really help to explain that postulated change from molecules to man, or fish to philosopher that Darwinism makes?(4)
As our understanding of genetics has improved, it has become increasingly clear that mutations + time + chance do not equal Darwinism. All observed mutations demonstrate a loss of genetic information from the genetic code, or they are neutral. Darwinism claims that the process has no direction or goal. If you look at the complexity of the “first” organism, it must be accepted that a massive amount of information has been produced to explain the variety of life we see today. Mutations cannot generate new genetic information; so they cannot be used to explain how Darwinism has proceeded from a cell with less information than is present in modern cells.(5)
How does (Darwinism) molecules-to-man have an information problem?
Information is the real heart of the problem for people who believe that life could have arisen by Darwinism. All life is built up on the basis of information. This information is contained in our DNA—the molecule of heredity. It’s like a series of letters and a code to read them.
A good comparison would be the Morse code. If you understand the code with dots and dashes representing letters of the alphabet, you can read something that’s put in Morse code.
If Darwinian evolution were true, then the very first organism had to have information in the form of letters and a code. Darwinists say that as organisms evolved, new information had to be continually added. In other words, millions of times over millions of years, new information would have to be generated by random processes and added to the genetic system.
Now here’s the clincher: No one has ever documented even just one instance of new information arising from matter by itself. All observations in science show clearly that information only comes from previously existing information, and ultimately from an intelligence. And this fits with creation—not Darwinism.
A major problem for Darwinism is the huge increase in information content of organisms through time. Darwinism accepts additions and deletions of information as evidence of evolution of a population. The problem is that through the imagined history of life on earth, the information content of the genomes of organisms must have increased dramatically.(5)
Bait and Switch
The ideas of natural selection, speciation, adaptation, and evolution are often used interchangeably by secular scientists. Many classroom textbooks also use the terms in this way. When scientists and authors use evolution to mean both “change in features over time” and “the history of life on earth,” it is difficult to know which definition is being used in each instance. This is often used as a bait-and-switch technique (equivocation). When small changes that arise as a result of the loss of information are used as evidence for molecules-to-man evolution (Darwinism), the switch has occurred.(5)
Questions to Consider
Recognizing the failure of the fossil record to display the gradual nature of Darwinian evolution, Stephen J. Gould resurrected the idea of Darwinism in big jumps known as “punctuated equilibrium.” Major remodeling of body plans could occur if regulator genes caused multiple changes at once. This would explain gaps in the fossil record, but it is not supported by observational science. Even if these creatures were born, what would they mate with?
Where did all the new information come from since mutations are known to reduce information?
Does similarity always prove that one structure evolved into another?
A large fish allows a small fish or shrimp to clean parasites from its mouth and then swims off without eating the cleaner. How could this relationship, and other irreducibly complex systems, have evolved one step at a time?
How do you select for the ability to fix a mutation that you don’t have?
How did the first organism survive without the second, and vice versa?
If you can pedal a bicycle at an average of 10 mph, how long would it take to reach the moon riding your bicycle taking a three hour break every fifth hour?
Is Darwinism a valid scientific idea since it cannot be observed in experiments and repeated to show that the conclusions it claims are valid?
What mechanisms do scientists use to explain how mutations can produce new information to make organisms more complex, when virtually all mutations cause a loss of information or no change at all?
Since information cannot be created from matter by purely natural mechanisms and since it is not a part of the material universe, how did information originate?
By what mechanism is new information added to genomes in Darwinian evolutionary history? Can the information gain be demonstrated experimentally?
What direct fossil evidence is there that fish could have evolved into amphibians? Could the alleged transitional fossils be interpreted in multiple ways?
When two lines of evidence contradict each other (e.g., if DNA suggests one Darwinian evolutionary relationship and anatomy suggests a different relationship), how do scientists decide which line of evidence is more compelling?
Why is Darwinism the key to understanding biology? Why is it necessary to know where the eye evolved from to understand how it works and how to treat it when it has a disease?
Why do examples of natural selection get equated with Darwinism when Darwinian evolution is not observable and natural selection is?
Why do biology textbooks include the photo of the peppered moth when scientists have shown it to be a fraud?
Should we accept everything that the text tells us about Darwinian evolution when the textbooks are constantly being changed and updated?
If Darwinian evolution is not directed by a purpose, would it be safe to say that human existence is purposeless?
What is the basis for truth and morality if human life is a byproduct of Darwinian evolutionary processes (random interactions of lifeless chemicals)?
Are humans more special or important than any other organism if there is no such thing as higher and lower animals in an Darwinian evolutionary framework?
Is it possible to know the original function of an organ that is called vestigial, like the appendix, when most tissues are not preserved in fossils and the ancestor cannot be examined? It would seem that there are many assumptions involved in making such a claim.
Does Darwinian evolution predict stasis or progress? Why are so many “living fossils” found that have remained the same for hundreds of millions of years while other species have evolved relatively rapidly?
There seem to be many different definitions of evolution; do all scientists agree on what evolution is? Which view of evolution is correct (punctuated equilibrium, neo-Darwinism, Darwinism, etc.)?
Why do scientists consider homologous structures evidence of a common ancestor when they seem to fit the expected pattern, but scientists call them examples of convergent evolution when they don’t fit the pattern?
What types of evidence would Darwinists accept as evidence against Darwinism?
Is “Just give it enough time and it will happen.” a scientific statement?
Historical Background on the Discovery of Natural Selection
Many people give credit to Charles Darwin for formulating the theory of natural selection as described in his book “On the Origin of Species.” Few people realize that Charles Darwin only popularized the idea and actually borrowed it from several other people, especially a creationist by the name of Edward Blyth. Blyth published several articles describing the process of natural selection in “Magazine of Natural History” between 1835 and 1837—a full 22 years before Darwin published his book “On the Origin of Species.” It is also known that Charles Darwin had copies of these magazines and that parts of “On The Origin of Species” are nearly verbatim from Blyth’s articles.(7)
Blyth, however, differed from Darwin in his starting assumptions. Blyth believed in God as the Creator, rather than the blind forces of nature. He believed that God created original kinds, that all modern species descended from those kinds, and that natural selection acted by conserving rather than originating. Blyth also believed that man was a separate creation from animals. This is especially important since humans are made in the image of God, an attribute that cannot be applied to animals (Genesis 1:27). Blyth seemed to view natural selection as a mechanism designed directly or indirectly by God to allow His creation to survive in a post-Fall, post-Flood world. This is very different from Darwin’s view. Darwin wrote, “What a book a devil’s chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low and horridly cruel works of nature.”(8)
Questions to Consider if You Believe Darwinism 1. Recognizing the failure of the fossil record to display the gradual nature of Darwinian evolution, Stephen J. Gould resurrected the idea of Darwinism in big jumps known as “punctuated equilibrium.” Major remodeling of body plans could occur if regulator genes caused multiple changes at once. This would explain gaps in the fossil record, but it is not supported by observational science. Even if these creatures were born, what would they mate with?
2. Where did all the new information come from since mutations are known to reduce information?
3. Does similarity always prove that one structure evolved into another?
4. A large fish allows a small fish or shrimp to clean parasites from its mouth and then swims off without eating the cleaner. How could this relationship, and other irreducibly complex systems, have evolved one step at a time?
5. How do you select for the ability to fix a mutation that you don’t have?
6. How did the first organism survive without the second, and vice versa?
7. If you can pedal a bicycle at an average of 10 mph, how long would it take to reach the moon riding your bicycle taking a three hour break every fifth hour?
8. Is Darwinism a valid scientific idea since it cannot be observed in experiments and repeated to show that the conclusions it claims are valid?
9. What mechanisms do scientists use to explain how mutations can produce new information to make organisms more complex, when virtually all mutations cause a loss of information or no change at all?
10. Since information cannot be created from matter by purely natural mechanisms and since it is not a part of the material universe, how did information originate?
11. By what mechanism is new information added to genomes in Darwinian evolutionary history? Can the information gain be demonstrated experimentally?
12. What direct fossil evidence is there that fish could have evolved into amphibians? Could the alleged transitional fossils be interpreted in multiple ways?
13. When two lines of evidence contradict each other (e.g., if DNA suggests one Darwinian evolutionary relationship and anatomy suggests a different relationship), how do scientists decide which line of evidence is more compelling?
14. Why is Darwinism the key to understanding biology? Why is it necessary to know where the eye evolved from to understand how it works and how to treat it when it has a disease?
15. Why do examples of natural selection get equated with Darwinism when Darwinian evolution is not observable and natural selection is?
16. Why do biology textbooks include the photo of the peppered moth when scientists have shown it to be a fraud?
17. Should we accept everything that the text tells us about Darwinian evolution when the textbooks are constantly being changed and updated?
18. If Darwinian evolution is not directed by a purpose, would it be safe to say that human existence is purposeless?
19. What is the basis for truth and morality if human life is a byproduct of Darwinian evolutionary processes (random interactions of lifeless chemicals)?
20. Are humans more special or important than any other organism if there is no such thing as higher and lower animals in an Darwinian evolutionary framework?
21. Is it possible to know the original function of an organ that is called vestigial, like the appendix, when most tissues are not preserved in fossils and the ancestor cannot be examined? It would seem that there are many assumptions involved in making such a claim.
22. Does Darwinian evolution predict stasis or progress? Why are so many “living fossils” found that have remained the same for hundreds of millions of years while other species have evolved relatively rapidly?
23. There seem to be many different definitions of evolution; do all scientists agree on what evolution is? Which view of evolution is correct (punctuated equilibrium, neo-Darwinism, Darwinism, etc.)?
24. Why do scientists consider homologous structures evidence of a common ancestor when they seem to fit the expected pattern, but scientists call them examples of convergent evolution when they don’t fit the pattern?
25. What types of evidence would Darwinists accept as evidence against Darwinism?
26. Is “Just give it enough time and it will happen.” a scientific statement?
Hover over Romans 1:20-22 for proof of God's existence, and over Matthew 5:27-28 for Judgment Day’s perfect standard. Then hover over John 3:16-18 for what God did, and over Acts 17:30-31 for what you need to do.
150,000
People
Will Die Today The counter below is ticking off the number of
people who have died since you opened this webpage. Is today your day? Perhaps tomorrow? What will it
be like to face God? See NeedGod.com
Andy Stanley: The Best Question Ever There's one question that will revolutionize the way you make decisions and in this book, Andy Stanley not only informs you of that question, he acutally explains in detail how it has changed his life and how it will change yours too.
Antony Flew: There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind Antony Flew for 50 years was one of the world's preeminent atheists when he published over 30 books in which he made the case against God's existence. One thing however kept Antony Flew from staying an atheist which was that he had made it his commitment to honestly, "follow the argument wherever it leads" which lead him to a belief in God as Creator. Are you as honest in your search for the truth as Antony Flew is?
Barbour Publishing: Bible Promise Book KJV A collection of the promises made to us by God from his being slow to anger through to the wonderful worship He so deserves from each of us.
Billy Graham: Death and the Life After In this book Dr. Billy Graham answers the question many people have about waht awaits us beyond this life and addresses more complex modern day issues of euthanasia, suicide, and living wills. Reading this book will help you find peace, assurance, triumph and even humor in a subject which is important to everyone.
Billy Graham: Peace With God We live in a world which seems to have lost its fragile grasp on serenity and for the first time in history, an entire generation of young people lives in fear of a type of nuclear holocaust will occur before they grow up which may explain the tragic events happening around us today. Wouldn't it be great to have something that releases you from this embattled world? You will get the comfort you need once you have, peace with God.
C. S. Lewis: Mere Christianity Former atheist C. S. Lewis was one of the intellectual giants of the 20th century and arguably the most influential Christian writer of his day. In this book he helps us experience the Christian faith by simply stating an unequaled opportunity for believers and nonbelievers alike to hear a powerful, rational case for the Christian faith.
C. S. Lewis: The Screwtape Letters (Gift Edition) In this book, the great C. S. Lewis walks the reader through the advice of Screwtape a senior demon to his nephew Woodworm a freshman demon that is doing his best to bring a human man to become a follower of their boss, Satan. Reading this book gives one an uncanny familiarly of the reality of choice and temptation.
Dr. David Jeremiah: What In the World Is Going On?: 10 Prophetic Clues You Cannot Afford to Ignore This New York Times, Wall Street Journal and USA Today best seller is an amazing and dramatic display of bible prophecies that David Jeremiah examines and explains so fascinatingly you can hardly put it down. This book is a timely display of bible prophecies describing events happening today.
Dr. Don Bierle: Surprised by Faith Don Bierle, Ph.D., recounts his journey from atheism to full acceptance of the Christian faith. As would be expected from a scientist, the treatment is linear, rational, and based on evidence.
"Surprised by Faith" outlines the case for theism and Christianity in just six short chapters. The presentation is accessible and is frequently used in churches to introduce Christianity to the unfamiliar or skeptical.
George Foreman: God In My Corner: A Spiritual Memoir It's another Knock Out for George Forman with this book! In it, he takes you through his life before and after both being a boxing world champ and Christian. I always admired George Forman. As a boxer he was very powerful and became the world's oldest world champ. And as a Christian, he an excellent example!
Hank Hanegraaff: The Complete Bible Answer Book: Collector's Edition As the title states, this is a complete answer book to the questions you have about the Bible. Covering both the Old and New Testaments, Hank Hanegraaff, "The Bible Answer Man" has done an excellent job at putting together definitive collection of answers to your questions about the Bible. Yes, the answers covers atheist misunderstandings and misquotes too.
Holman Bible Outreach: The Charles Darwin Bible This is the 200th Birthday Edition of "The Charles Darwin Bible." I recommend this Bible to anyone who holds Charles Darwin's evolution as fact.
J. Countryman, a division of Thomas Nelson, Inc: God's Answers For Your Life This little book is a must have for everyone from someone who is just "Beginning in Christ" as the first chapter starts, the second, "Growing in Christ," the third, "Maturing in Christ," the fourth, "Ministering in Christ," the fifth, "Hoping in Christ," the sixth, "Understanding in Christ," and the seventh, "Uniting in Christ." Each chapter is a set of verses from the Holy bible informing the reader of God's answers for the reader's life.
Lee Strobel: The Case for Faith: A Journalist Investigates the Toughest Objections to Christianity Now a former atheist, Lee Strobel turns his investigative skills to discover the barriers that people grapple with about faith in God. Find the answers so that you can drop the barriers you have up against God like; "Why all the suffering?" "Why does God eternally torment some people in hell if he loves everyone?" and answers to six more "heart" barriers to faith.
Norman L. Geisler & Frank Turek: I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist In this book you find out just how much faith it takes to be an atheist and believe me, it takes more faith to be an atheist than it does to be a Christian. Using science alone, these authors prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God exists and that the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible are true.
Stormie Omartian: The Power of a Praying® Wife This is a great book to help a wife become the wife her husband needs and the wife God wants her to be. In it, Stormie uses her own marriage to Michael as examples to the reader giving insight and understanding to both sides for improving marriage relationship with biblical prayers for a wife to focus her will to that of God's in her marriage.
Stormie Omartian: The Power of a Praying Husband This is a great book to help a husband become the husband his wife needs and the husband God wants him to be. In it, Stormie uses her own marriage to Michael as examples to the reader giving insight and understanding to both sides for improving marriage relationship with biblical prayers for a husband to focus his will to that of God's in his marriage.
Willard F. Harley Jr.: His Needs, Her Needs: Building an Affair-Proof Marriage What will it take to make your marriage SIZZLE?
Over one million couples have read this book and they are and I am recommending it to you so that you too will discover that an outstanding marriage can be more than a dream---it can be your reality!
Recent Comments