Finding Truth Today - Blog

"The God Delusion" Changed My Life (part 1)

My Encounter with “The God Delusion” and how it changed my life.

This is the story of how reading Richard Dawkins’ book, “The God Delusion” changed my life. As I was reading it, with each passing sentence I felt my faith growing stronger my in God’s promises. Each passing paragraph was prompting me to evangelism of the Gospel of Christ Jesus to atheists.

The story actually begins back in the late 70s when I was 18 years old. It will continue until the time which God has allotted for me to be on this earth ends.

My Arguing with God one Night

One night when I was 18 years old after taking more than half a bottle of over the counter sleeping pills, I lay wide awake in bed all night not being able to close my eyes for more than a few seconds at a time. God told me that I was going to be an evangelist spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ to thousands of people and point them to the truth of His love for them. I started arguing with God. I told Him that there’s no way that I’m going to do that because if I did that, that I’d be a huge hypocrite. God told me again that I would be and evangelist pointing people to Him and again I told Him that I would not be. (Proverbs 17:19)

I knew of and actually ran around with a preacher who was in secrete living the same lies I was and I first hand saw his hypocrisy. We would compete for the same women, drink the same alcohol, and smoke the same pot. There was no way that I wanted to be that much of a hypocrite. I remember asking him about how could he preach in the pulpit and do what he was doing and not feel that it was wrong. He told me that it was easy because he didn’t preach against what he was doing.

Nonetheless in reality, he was doing the exact same think I was, saying that he was a Christian yet not letting God lead his life and going against God’s teachings and living a life of lies. Thus this preacher’s hypocrisy was the same as mine. He was not asking forgiveness and was planning sinful actions and not following Christ Jesus’ teachings yet he was supposedly teaching Christ Jesus’ instructions and saying that he was a Christian. (Psalm 59:12)

So I continued to knowingly do what I knew was wrong and knowingly not do what I knew was correct and ignored God as often as I could which was most all the time because I had become very good at deluding the truth to myself and to others. And I didn’t evangelize to anyone the good news of Christ Jesus because I didn’t care enough about anyone else other than myself and what I wanted.

I Bought and Read Richard Dawkins’ book, “The God Delusion”

It wasn’t until I was in my mid 30s that I admitted the truth to myself and to God that I was a liar and had not been following Christ Jesus even though I had been saying that I was a Christian. I confessed to God that I should not be acting as I was because I know the truth and asked God for forgiveness and through the loving gift of His only begotten Son Jesus’ death on a cross and resurrection, God forgives me because I repented of and repent of the sins I commit (Romans 5:8 ). At that time I also started allowing God to lead me in life instead of just doing things on my own. And although I’m still not perfect I allow God to lead me and guide me. (2 Samuel 22:31)

One day not long after “The God Delusion” was published, I was in a book store and was strongly compelled to get it. So I bought it and I started reading it. As I read it, I realized that even though I had not done much study of the Bible, that what Richard Dawkins had written was way off from what the Bible actually had written in it. I also noticed that Richard Dawkins has a habit of stating something as fact when there is no evidence of it at all. As I continued to read “The God Delusion” I couldn’t help but realize that Richard Dawkins was attacking straw men he made up and was stating that this is was God and Christianity was all about. The more I read “The God Delusion” the more I was compelled to do something to correct all of the erroneous teachings about God and Christ Jesus that Richard Dawkins had written. (2 John 1:7; 2 Peter 2:3)

It was at this point in my mid-forties that I remembered and realized that what God had told me when I was 18 about me being an evangelist for Him was going to actually happen. God had not told me that sometime in the future I would be an evangelist for Him. God just told me when I was 18 that I would be an evangelist for Him. I knew now as I read “The God Delusion” that just as God had told me when I was 18 that I would not be a hypocrite being an evangelist for God because unlike when God first told me what I would be doing for Him, I now let Him lead me in life and I fully trust Him. (James 3:1)

So in 2008 at the age of 46 I started a web site, blog (http://FindingTruthToday.org) and Twitter (https://twitter.com/GospelToday) and in December 2010 a YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/user/FindingTruthToday) to evangelize God’s message of love and to point people to Him just as God had told me when I was 18 that I would do.

My evangelism of the Gospel of Christ Jesus thus started because of Richard Dawkins’ book, “The God Delusion” and reading “The God Delusion” also was when I started studying the Bible and evidence supporting it. The more I read the Bible and study it and learn more about it and am asked to answer questions about it, the more the Bible stands as solid evidence that it came from God to us so that we can learn of His great love for us. (Romans 5:8)

The Onus is On You, Not Me

I’ve learned over the last four years that many atheists do not read anything which goes against their religion of Atheism. I guess many atheists feel threatened reading books by Ravi Zacharias, Lee Strobel, Antony Flew, C. S. Lewis, and others who were once atheist but during an honest search for truth let the evidence lead them to the truth; Christ Jesus is God and He exists. I also learned over these years that many atheists think that followers of Christ Jesus are afraid to actually test their faith in Christ Jesus. These atheists falsely believe that followers of Christ Jesus have a blind faith. Well, in reality followers of Christ Jesus are actually taught to test and examine ourselves to see if we are actually in the faith. (2 Corinthians 13:5) This teaching is why I read Richard Dawkins’ book among many other secular writings.

 

If you are an atheist who is about to contact me about it being my burden of proof to prove to you God’s existence, don’t because that’s not how it works. Your apathy of knowing absolute truth is not my burden to bear. It is up to you to choose for yourself to take responsibility for yourself to seek to find, know and accept absolute truth or not and it is not up to me or anyone else to choose for you nor is it up to me or anyone else to give to you the proof you need. The proof you want (if you honestly want it) of God’s existence is the proof you need and only you and God know what that is, not me nor anyone else knows but you and God.

 

Actually Reading “The God Delusion”

During my reading of The God Delusion, I could hardly believe that anyone could have placed their faith in such absurdity as what Dawkins wrote let alone that someone with supposedly a great academic background as Dawkins wrote so poorly and had such an illusory imagination which he passes off as reality that some people actually believe is reality. As I was reading it what kept coming to my mind was, “Wow, how is this is a bestselling book?” If it wasn’t for the book being in the non-fiction section of the bookstore where I got it I would have thought it was a very poorly written science fiction writing with a very lame plot that could never become a B movie or a local cable TV show. Yet in reality I knew it was and is a very poorly written science fiction writing being called “science” used as bait by Richard Dawkins to lure and catch his prey; those who choose to not clearly think for themselves.

 

Basically Richard Dawkins’ evangelism of Atheism is his sole purpose for the book. It is my assumption that many followers of the religion of Atheism will not complete reading this first article let alone the series of articles on Richard Dawkins’ book because they are choosing to be limited in their thinking and staying in their little box. These atheists following the religion of Atheism cannot think outside the little box that they have placed themselves into. These atheists are so far deluded into the Richard Dawkins Delusion that they may never be bright enough to actually read anything that is in opposition to their religion of Atheism. These atheists thus choose to give up their own will to clearly think for themselves just to faithfully follow the likes of Richard Dawkins’ musings as absolute truth. These atheists following the religion of Atheism are like the ones who actually allow and find reverence in censorship of anything that is against their teachings such as that on the RichardDawkins.net forums which prohibit all discussions which are against their religion of Atheism. These are the atheists who are so limited in their thinking that many of them cannot get out of the Pandora’s box they’ve placed themselves into and honestly without bias read something that goes against their religion of Atheism. These atheists are afraid to actually test their faith in Atheism.

 

How to not fall prey to the likes of Richard Dawkins

But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come. For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; Avoid such men as these. For among them are those who enter into households and captivate weak women weighed down with sins, led on by various impulses, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. (2 Timothy 3:1-7)

 

There are people in the world like Richard Dawkins and his gods Carl Sagan, Stephen Hawking, and Steven Weinberg, who take great care to distort the truth and insert their own delusion and misrepresentations in place of the truth. (2 Peter 2:1-3) All the while Richard Dawkins and the like find amusement in their power positions with their advanced degrees using illogical pretense to persuade people into thinking that their supremacy is absolute truth all the while stating that they are onto something new beyond anything ever conceived of before by anyone ever in all of written history. Richard Dawkins thinks he is above the average man in his understanding of God’s existence and thus uses his inelegant writing skills to hunt down and mislead people who trust his word because he has such “enlightenment,” degrees, and credentials. (Psalms 146:3)

 

The Richard Dawkins category of person make prey of those people who are not inclined to personally research the powerful evidence of God’s true existence nor are they willing to forgo their lusts for satisfying their own selfish desires. (Galatians 5:19-21) The prey of Richard Dawkins are also delusional because they do not use their own wisdom to truly research both sides as they use their free will to purposefully choose to hear what satisfies their ambition to do whatever they want to do and call it truth. (James 3:13-16)

 

Richard Dawkins and others like him arrogantly feed their prey what they want to hear thus elevating him to “god” status in his and their minds as the prey he feeds wants more to quench their thirst for self-gratification and hunger for unlimited lack of taking personal responsibility for their deeds. (2 Peter 2:17-19) Richard Dawkins and those like him are great deceivers who are most able and willing to delude their prey with partial truths, misrepresentations, elegant writings and witty statements all the while as they are preaching about the atheist faith and religious practices of Atheism as if they are on to something anew. (Matthew 7:15)

 

Richard Dawkins, I believe has less faith in his atheist religion of Atheism that God does not exist and more conviction than he wants to admit in that God does indeed exist. (Hebrews 11:1-3) Richard Dawkins is truly delusional in his quest of persuading his prey to sacrifice him or herself to the atheist faith and that he, Richard Dawkins is the beholder of absolute truth in God’s nonexistence and thus entices his prey to spread his word of guile against God. (Titus 1:10) Richard Dawkins maintains that he is a god of enlightenment and wants his prey to believe it too so to help him better his hunger for supremacy over those who give him sovereignty over them so to try and overcome the conviction he has of the absolute existence of God. (Romans 14:22)

 

Caution to those who fall prey to Richard Dawkins and his kind. Do not take his word for the truth. Start your own research and find the truth for it is there for you to find and accept. Open your minds to more than Richard Dawkins’ heresy through his droll assertions, clever remarks, shadowy charisma and tainted details which at first take seems founded and reasonable but if honestly thought about and researched is discovered to be pure deception. (2 Corinthians 11:14) Respect goes to those who seek out and find the truth that don’t fall prey to deceitful people. (Romans 12:17)

 

Two Outcomes and only Two Outcomes Exist

It would be a shame if I have offended any atheist at this point so to have an atheist quit reading this article because it is well known that many atheists do not want to get anywhere near absolute truth and have an abnormally thin wall of respect for anyone thinking differently than they do because they think that they are so much more enlightened than Christians. (Proverbs 18:13) Tolerance is what they preach but intolerance is in their actions. (1 Samuel 2:3) My challenge to the atheist is to test your atheist faith and continue reading this series of articles if you think God does not exist. (Colossians 2:4)

 

Remember, only two ultimate outcomes exist after you finish reading this series of articles. You will either keep your mind closed, continue to believe that God does not exist and not do any research of your own to test your atheist faith or you will test your atheist faith, open your mind and truly research the existence of God for yourself and make your choice of faith based because of your knowledge and understanding of all the facts about God and not just because someone told you something. (2 Peter 1:5-8) For is it not better to truly know something because you yourself, have honestly researched both sides of the issue for yourself and know the facts from fiction, the reality from delusion and not just have taken someone else’s word for something you pronounce as your beliefs and have put your total faith in and wager your eternal life on? (John 3:16)

 

Don’t fall prey to the kinds of Richard Dawkins. Continue to read this series of articles and do your own research into God’s existence. The day will come that your choice will really matter. Don’t let your day come with you not properly prepared for your eternal life. (Romans 6:23)

 

Religion versus God

As stated above, Richard Dawkins in his book, The God Delusion, made much hype in his writing in mistaking religious practice with something to do with God’s existence. (James 1:26) God exists regardless of religion. (Genesis 1:1) Richard Dawkins’ error goes along with his character flaw in that he knows in bringing up various religious practices in dissimilar religions, he can better persuade people to follow him due to some of the absurd religious rituals and the bewildered hordes who practice them. (2 Timothy 4:3) Richard Dawkins knows that he can persuade his prey to believe in him by bringing up the absurdities of these ridiculous religious practices and the misuses and abuses that have come about due to the selfish nature of mankind.

 

Richard Dawkins knows that some of the ridiculous religious practices and beliefs were declared to be Christian in nature but were far from being based on the absolute one and only God of the Holy Bible and do not follow Christ Jesus’ teachings. Just as in Richard Dawkins’ deceitful teachings with cunning elegant words and phony etiquette, these bogus religions had godless leaders say that they were/are teaching as Christians and that they were following Jesus Christ yet they were not Christians and they were perverted through their vanity, greed, sexual perversions and hunger for power. (2 Peter 2:17-19) These godless leaders full of charisma distort the Holy Bible to contort into their own religious teachings with strategy to reign over their followers and encourage their followers with empty promises that the followers want to hear as they resolve in their own conceited desires. These depraved godless leaders create cult followers of their prey who carry out religious orders for whatever the godless leader requests. This following allows for the “Jim Jones” type community which has played itself out over and over again in various degrees throughout history.[1]

 

Richard Dawkins knows that in bringing up religion, he can cite a variety of examples that display non-Christian religious practice falsely being said to be Christian being lead through godless leaders throughout history as described above to make his case against God’s existence. You must understand that in these non-Christian religious practices the one true God does not exist in their teachings even though they may say He is, they are as deceitful as Richard Dawkins himself, set out to do their own bidding and teaching their own prophecy. (1 John 2:22) Richard Dawkins knows however that regardless of perverted or not religious practices of anyone anywhere at any time that this does not prove that God does not exist. It only proves that people everywhere can be duped into following false doctrine (including Atheism) and need to seek and find the truth for themselves and know that beyond any religion practice only one true God exists and that is the God described in the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible.

 

Mankind’s Sinful Nature versus God

Richard Dawkins knows that mankind has a sinful nature and that we do not want to follow the word of God. (Romans 7:5) He also knows that our sinful nature can and has corrupted leaders in all ages throughout history due to the powerful positions held and the greediness of some leaders to take advantage of a given situation when the timing is right to do so.

 

Richard Dawkins knows that some of these leaders corrupted through their greed of money, others through their lusts of sex while others desired influence over people and still others like Richard Dawkins, have voracity and aspiration for ultimate supremacy. Richard Dawkins knows that by bringing up in his fetid writings the Christian leaders who have fallen to their sinful nature that he can persuade some people to think that these Christian leaders falling gives reason that God does not exist. Richard Dawkins knows his prey will believe him and thus get him that much closer to satisfying his hunger and reaching his ambition for ultimate supremacy.

 

There are Christian leaders who have fallen to temptation. (Luke 8:13) No one is beyond the right temptation without accepting the strength of God to help them overcome. (Isaiah 12:2) It is truly a shame for Christian leaders to fall as there are so many avenues to which they could have held fast so to gain strength against their temptations and not fall prey to temptation if they had just deepened their faith in God and had gone to the Elders in their church instead of relying solely on their own strength simply to find themselves bowing to their own will and into temptation. (2 Peter 2:9) Richard Dawkins knows but will not admit regardless the number of fallen Christian leaders, only one true God exists and that is the God described in the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible.

 

One’s Religious Experience versus God

Richard Dawkins knows that one’s own personal religious participation, experiences and observations from childhood through adolescence to adulthood directly correlate to one’s belief in God. Take in comparison Richard Dawkins and my personal religious participation, experiences and observations. Richard Dawkins in his childhood made “sport” of disrepute and sidetracking his chaplain away from the teachings about God at his school while in contrast I was actively involved and enjoyed the scriptural teachings being taught and respected the people teaching me about God.

 

Through adolescence, Richard Dawkins I’m sure kept to his “sport” and closed his mind even more to Biblical teachings to become today the self-proclaimed god of Atheism disciple he is as an adult while I kept my mind open and even though I made some poor choices along the way, I knew from my childhood Biblical teachings that God existed and that He was there for me during the low times giving me strength to get through my poor choices to become the person I am today writing a series of articles to show how delusional Richard Dawkins is in his saying that God does not exist.

 

The observations made throughout our lifetimes have also made vast differences between Richard Dawkins and me. Richard Dawkins we know through his writings that he sees and longs to focus on the darker side of things and that he takes out of context the facts within the Bible so to distort them into what he wants them to say in his quest for his own supremacy over his prey while I stick to the facts, seek the light and give all the glory to God. These stark contrasts in religious participation, experiences and observations throughout our lives developed two very different outcomes; Richard Dawkins and his claims that there is no God preying on those who will worship him and me knowing that God exists and spreading the good news for all who will hear will open their minds and do an honest seeking of the truth for themselves. (Romans 10:16)

 

Richard Dawkins knows that he can use one’s own personal religious participation, experiences and observations to persuade his prey to believe in him because his prey is often someone who has encountered the bogus religious practices, the sinfulness of mankind, the charisma of a godless proclaimed Christian leader, or a Christian leader which has fallen to which Richard Dawkins proclaims proves beyond a doubt that God does not exist. Richard Dawkins knows that his prey merely takes him at his word and fails to use their own wisdom to research God’s existence beyond Dawkins’ word. Richard Dawkins knows his prey progressively selects to do what satisfies their laziness in not doing any of their own research to know the truth and that his prey will make him their supreme voice of truth thus duped that they in reading his word are enlightened in truth. (2 Timothy 3:1-5) Richard Dawkins also knows although he will not admit it, that God exists regardless of anyone’s past or present religious experience.

 

Trials and Tribulations versus God

Everyone has to go through trials and tribulations here on earth and all people experience at some point in their life trials and tribulations that will be of a religious nature. A shame is that many of people per a past or current negative religious experience go through their trials and tribulations giving up their own character instead of growing it, disregarding their freedom instead of using it, not using their own voice to call out fallacies and so fall prey to likes of Richard Dawkins whilst cursing God instead of calling on God to provide them strength to persevere. (Jeremiah 17-5)

 

Trials and tribulations that we all experience build up or tear down our character dependent upon how we handle them. Without trials and tribulations, no one would grow stronger in one’s character. If everything was always going our way, there would be no challenges and problems of any kind for us to figure out and solve, nothing for us to discover, nothing for us to overcome and go beyond, and nothing to build our characters stronger than it was before the trials and tribulations came upon us. With no trials and tribulations we could not cope with life on earth because mankind needs these to survive. No matter how large or small, all trials and tribulations we experience in our life are needed to help us go beyond our selfish self and to reach out to others in love and can help us find God. (Matthew 7:14) Christians are promised trials and tribulations while here on earth. (James 1:2-16) Christians are taught to have faith that God will always give us what we need and that He will give us strength to persevere through the trials and tribulations before us to endure. (Romans 5:1-5)

 

Richard Dawkins knows that he can use people’s trials and tribulations to persuade his prey into believing in his word and have them follow him through his erroneously illuminating his prey that if there really was a God that we would not have trials and tribulations to endure. What Richard Dawkins is unlikely to admit is that he knows God exists regardless of anyone’s trials and tribulations and in fact that God wants us to call upon Him for strength and endurance to get through the trials and tribulations and thus bolster our character through them and build our faith in God.

 

Anyone who has actually read the Bible knows that trials and tribulations are guaranteed to happen here within this fallen world for everyone; both dammed and saved. For example, we are informed by God in the Bible Acts 14:22 that; “strengthening the souls of the disciples, exhorting them to continue in the faith, and saying, "We must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God." “And not only that, but we also glory in tribulations, knowing that tribulation produces perseverance;” Romans 5:3

 

End of Part One

In part two I will go more into Richard Dawkins’ rants which he wrote in his book, “The God Delusion” which brought me to actually have more faith in Christ Jesus and to evangelize the Gospel of Christ Jesus and helped me discover the Five Commandments of Atheism that all atheists follow.

 

> <

The Five Commandments of Atheism (Part 1)

The Five Commandments of Atheism

This is the first of a six part series of articles that discuss the Five Commandments of Atheism. In this series of articles, you will be exposed to the religion of Atheism’s commandments and how they each came about. (Romans 1:16-17)

 

For over four years I have been studying the religion of Atheism. During this time, I have found that there are five clear aspects of Atheism which all atheists follow. I call these five characteristics, “The Five Commandments of Atheism.” This first article is an introduction of The Five Commandments of Atheism. In the subsequent articles I will expound upon each of the five commandments of Atheism.

 

Yes, atheists have a set of five commandments that they follow. Like all religions there’s a code of conduct within the atheist religion, Atheism. Just as not every Christian follows the ten commandments to perfection, not every atheist follows their five commandments to perfection. Given enough time as a person continues to practice atheism however, the majority of atheists ensue each one more faithfully the longer they continue to denounce God. (Isaiah 47:10)

 

Many atheists do not even know that there is a set of five atheist commandments that they follow yet they follow them just the same. Atheists are able to follow the atheist commandments so well because they do their best to exclude God from their life in each and every way that they can. With their continuing efforts of exclusion of God from their life, atheists live out each of the five atheist commandments.

 

Atheism’s Five Commandments

Atheists think that if they could just get everyone who believes in God to not do so or to at least say that they do not do so just to appease them, that they (the atheist) would be able to not think about God. This not thinking about God however is impossible for anyone to do because God has wired us to think about Him. Atheists go to great lengths to get God out of their life. They go to such great lengths that they ignore the abundance of evidence all around which points to God. Atheists’ trying to not think about God and ignoring the evidence of God is their number one commandment: Suppress the Truth (Romans 1:18)

 

In their suppressing the truth atheists have come up with some of the stupidest things to think about to divert their thoughts about God. Things like Darwinism and its little whooping cranes Richard Dawkins is so fond of for example. Being a topic that has no factual supporting evidence whatsoever, Darwinism demands the likes of Richard Dawkins in his book, “The God Delusion” to ramble along with his musings, misquotes, half facts, and not to mention the “multitudes of infusions of sheer luck” to just keep Darwinism from going the way of the dodo bird. An atheist’s effort to suppress the truth with such vigor takes a great deal of time and thought and brings us to the atheist’s second commandment: Futile Thinking (Romans 1:21)

 

With their efforts to suppress the truth through futile thinking, a lot of atheistic competition takes place amongst the stated atheists who are supposedly smarter than the average atheist and in their mind, and holding that they are also in their minds compared to a Christian, an absolute genius. The atheistic competition between the atheist elites to become “the one” who can best come up with more ways to suppress the truth through futile thinking has created a small set of atheist gurus who have a huge following of atheists and extremely huge overbearing egos such as Richard Dawkins. Atheists like Richard Dawkins and his kind are placed on pedestals in deity status by mere atheists. Richard Dawkins and his kind accept and live for this divinity recognition. Richard Dawkins and his kind along with the atheist holiest being of all to the religion of atheism, Charles Darwin, brings us to the third atheist commandment: Idolatry of anything other than the one true God of all Creation (Romans 1:22-25)

 

The fourth atheist commandment is one that not all atheists adhere to but if they are a true atheist can have nothing against anyone from doing anything someone chooses to do or not do. The fourth atheist commandment is applicable to telling the truth and other moral matters like rape and murder. A true atheist states that no absolute objective grounds exists against lying, sex outside of marriage, murder, slander, pornography, stealing, murder, rape, etc. Atheists already suppress the truth; lying. Atheists are often not against marriage but most are okay with a man and woman living together and sexual relations outside of marriage. Atheists are also often pro-choice for abortion; murder. Most atheists are okay with slander as long as the slander is pointed at someone who follows Christ Jesus. Again, the fourth atheist commandment is one which is not fully followed by all atheists but given enough time and if the person holds himself or herself as a true atheist as outlined by Friedrich Nietzsche, there is no absolute objective standard for morality thus all is mere choice and opinion. The fourth atheist commandment is: Immorality (Romans 1:26-27)

 

Atheists suppressing the truth through their futile thinking while worshiping their idols like Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking, living an immoral life by evangelizing their atheist diarrhea gives way to the fifth and most consistent atheist commandment. The fifth atheist commandment strikes each and every atheist each time that they open their mouth to spew their diarrhea at someone who does believe in God. When an atheist tries to persuade someone to not believe in God using their suppressed truth, futile thinking, idolatry ridden immoral diarrhea, they have directly opened up and have shown the world their fifth commandment: Insanity (Romans 1:28-32) (Ecclesiastes 9:3)

 

Isaiah 47:10 (New International Version)

You have trusted in your wickedness and have said, 'No one sees me.' Your wisdom and knowledge mislead you when you say to yourself, 'I am, and there is none besides me.'

 

Romans 1:16-32 (New International Version)

¹⁶I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.

¹⁷For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."

¹⁸The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, ¹⁹since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

²⁰For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

²¹For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. ²²Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools ²³and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

²⁴Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.

²⁵They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

²⁶Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.

²⁷In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

²⁸Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.

²⁹They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,

³⁰slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;

³¹they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

³²Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.

 

Ecclesiastes 9:3 (New American Standard)

This is an evil in all that is done under the sun, that there is one fate for all men. Furthermore, the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil and insanity is in their hearts throughout their lives. Afterwards they go to the dead.

  

End of part one - The Five Commandments of Atheism

Darwinian Evolution from Leading Darwinists

Here is the truth about Darwinian Evolution (Darwinism) directly from Leading Darwinists themselves. Let’s review the truth about Darwinism that Leading Darwinists proclaim about Darwinian Evolution and draw some deductions from what we learn so that we can come to an informed conclusion about Darwinism.

Truth about Darwinism from Leading Darwinists

Franklin Harold, Emeritus Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Colorado State University stated; “we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.” (Harold, Franklin M. (Prof. Emeritus Biochemistry, Colorado State University) The way of the cell: molecules, organisms and the order of life, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001, p. 205)

Paul Davies a British-born, internationally acclaimed physicist, writer and broadcaster, who holds the position of Professor of Natural Philosophy in the Australian Centre for Astrobiology at Macquarie University, Sydney admitted; “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.” (Davies, Paul, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Sydney, New Scientist 179(2403):32, 2003.)

Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet.” (Knoll, Andrew H., PBS Nova interview, How Did Life Begin? July 1, 2004)

Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.” (Crick, F., What mad pursuit: a Personal View of Scientific Discovery, Sloan Foundation Science, London, 1988, p. 138.)

Richard Dawkins a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and author wrote, “biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.” (Dawkins, R., The Blind Watchmaker, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, p. 1, 1986)

Richard Dawkins also said, “[Darwinian] Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.” (pbs.org/now/printable/transcript349_full_print.html>, 3 December, 2004)

Harvard paleontologist (and Darwinian evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”. (Gould, Stephen Jay, Evolution’s erratic pace, Natural History 86(5):14, May 1977)

Gould also wrote, “the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.” (Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N., Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366:223–224, 1993)

Dr. Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: “In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.” (As quoted in the Boston Globe, 23 October 2005)

NAS(USA) member Dr. Philip Skell wrote, “Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.” (Skell, P.S., Why Do We Invoke Darwin? Evolutionary theory contributes little to experimental biology, The Scientist 19(16):10, 2005)

Because Darwinism is so malleable as to accommodate almost any conceivable observation, science philosopher Karl Popper, famous philosopher of science, said “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research programme ....” (Popper, K., Unended Quest, Fontana, Collins, Glasgow, p. 151, 1976)

Dr. Philip Skell also wrote, “It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers ….” (Skell, P.S., The Dangers Of Overselling Evolution; Focusing on Darwin and his theory doesn't further scientific progress, Forbes magazine, 23 Feb 2009; http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/23/evolution-creation-debate-biology-opinions-contributors_darwin.html)

Michael Ruse, Darwinian evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” (Ruse, M., How evolution became a religion: creationists correct? National Post, pp. B1,B3,B7 May 13, 2000)

Deductions Drawn from Leading Darwinists about Darwinian Evolution

With no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, having only a variety of wishful speculations, nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell thus we don’t really know how life originated on this planet per Darwinism. Not knowing how life originated on this planet per Darwinism, we also with Darwinism must constantly keep in mind that what we see was not designed, but rather evolved and always remember that biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose. One must remember too that although Darwinian Evolution hasn’t been observed while it’s happening, it encounters an extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record and the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem. (Note that all claimed “transitional forms” are speculations based upon Darwinian Evolution being true thus are circular reasoning.)

The contributions of Darwinian Evolution over the last 100 years has been that almost all of biology has proceeded independent of Darwinian Evolution, except Darwinian Evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken Darwinian Evolution into account at all because when an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery. Because Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research program, it is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers, etc.

Conclusions about Darwinian Evolution from Leading Darwinists about Darwinian Evolution

As Michael Ruse, Darwinian evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “[Darwinian] Evolution is a religion. This was true of [Darwinian] evolution in the beginning, and it is true of [Darwinian] evolution still today.”

How is it that people who believe Darwinian Evolution as factual actually believe it is fact? Richard Dawkins wrote, “The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.”

It takes the meme for blind faith to believe Darwinian Evolution is fact.

Conclusion

The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, they have committed abominable deeds; There is no one who does good. Psalms 14:1

I have complete confidence in the gospel; it is God's power to save all who believe, first the Jews and also the Gentiles. For the gospel reveals how God puts people right with himself: it is through faith from beginning to end. As the scripture says, "The person who is put right with God through faith shall live." God's anger is revealed from heaven against all the sin and evil of the people whose evil ways prevent the truth from being known. God punishes them, because what can be known about God is plain to them, for God himself made it plain. Ever since God created the world, his invisible qualities, both his eternal power [physics, mathematics, logic, etc.] and his divine nature [love, morals, etc], have been clearly seen; they are perceived in the things that God has made [universe, earth, life, etc.].

So those people [atheists] have no excuse at all! They know God, but they do not give him the honor that belongs to him, nor do they thank him. Instead, their thoughts have become complete nonsense [i.e., the universe created itself from nothing, life created itself from slime and Darwinian evolved into mankind], and their empty minds are filled with darkness [i.e., suicide is okay, abortion is okay, etc.].

They say they are wise, but they are fools; instead of worshiping the immortal God, they worship images made to look like mortals or birds or animals or reptiles. And so God has given those people over to do the filthy things their hearts desire [deceitfulness, slander, insulting, disrespect, hate, lust, pornography, drunkenness, etc.], and they do shameful things with each other [adultery, fortification, homosexual activities, bestiality, etc.]. They exchange the truth about God for a lie [i.e., Darwinism, Multi-universe, string]; they [atheists] worship and serve what God has created instead of the Creator himself, who is to be praised forever! Amen.

Because they do this, God has given them over to shameful passions. Even the women pervert the natural use of their sex by unnatural acts. In the same way the men give up natural sexual relations with women and burn with passion for each other. Men do shameful things with each other, and as a result they bring upon themselves the punishment they deserve for their wrongdoing [AIDS, STDs, etc.].

Because those people refuse to keep in mind the true knowledge about God, He has given them over to corrupted minds, so that they do the things that they should not do. They are filled with all kinds of wickedness, evil, greed, and vice; they are full of jealousy, murder, fighting, deceit, and malice. They gossip and speak evil of one another [and of those who love God]; they are hateful to God, insolent, proud, and boastful; they think of more ways to do evil; they disobey their parents; they have no conscience; they do not keep their promises, and they show no kindness or pity for others. They know that God's law says that people who live in this way deserve death. Yet, not only do they continue to do these very things, but they even approve of others who do them. Romans 1:16-32 (Good News Translation)

It’s Your Choice

You can choose to continue being a fool and ignore God as you’ve been doing or you can turn to Him right now and honestly apologize to God for the wrongs you have done, turning away from continuing to do them and accept Christ Jesus as full payment for the debt you owe to God for the wrongs you have done. It is simply your choice to make. I suggest that you make a wise choice today right now. “Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.” James 4:14

Nothing forms Nothing

Let’s look at two quotes from Richard Dawkins and examine them for their factual content and for their coherent merit.

First quote: “The fact that life evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing, is a fact so staggering that I would be mad to attempt words to do it justice.”

First off, Richard Dawkins implies that it is a “fact” that “live evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing” which broken down shows that Richard Dawkins says everything around us, universe, earth, you, and me, etc. came “out of literally nothing.”

Have you ever seen anything create itself from nothing? Just how long do you think it takes nothing to become something other than nothing performed all by nothing?

Do you know what nothing is? Nothing is the sort of thing rocks dream about. Nothing, no time, no anything, just nothing at all.

Can you do simple math? Zero plus Zero equal Zero; Nothing plus Nothing equal Nothing; Nothing times Nothing plus Nothing equal Nothing.

At what point does nothing become not nothing on its own? How many times nothing does it take for nothing plus nothing times nothing to become something?

Have you ever sat down and rationally thought through the validity of the universe and life coming from nothing with nothing causing everything to exist?

Second quote: “The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.”

It takes the meme for blind faith to believe everything came from nothing by nothing at all.

1. Richard Dawkins. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved May 6, 2011, from BrainyQuote.com Web site:
   http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/richarddaw402494.html

Really - Darwinism? No, not Really.

First Off

This article and corresponding video are not all encompassing; meaning they were done to get you to think for yourself and to not take anyone’s word for something and to hopefully entice you to actually do your own research on these topics. I suggest you (in fact dare you to) actually do your own straightforward honest research on these topics and not just jump to your preconceived notion about what these topics are from what you’ve been told by anyone; even me. I challenge you to honestly answer the twenty five questions at the end of this article and video. Also, at the end is a tidbit of historical background information you most likely didn’t know about natural selection.

Summary

Most students in evolutionary-biased education come to believe that mutations and natural selection result in one kind of creature changing into a totally different kind over long periods of time. However, seldom, if ever is the fact presented that for Darwinian Evolution to occur it is necessary for new genetic information to be added to a creature. To date, no example of completely new additional information from a naturally occurring mutation or selection has been observed. The diversity of species in, for example, dogs, cats and horses, has arisen because of their already-existing genetic information, acted upon by natural selection and mutations.(1)

Information

DNA is all around us. It is found in every plant and animal. You literally eat it at every meal. It is possible to extract pieces of DNA, consisting of billions of basic units (called “bases,” abbreviated as A, C, T, and G), with just a common onion and a few household chemicals.

It is amazing what you can hold in your hand. Each DNA strand is an extremely long molecule. While humans have about 3 billion bases in their DNA, the garden onion (Allium cepa) has 15 billion bases. If the DNA in a single human cell were stretched out it would be 6 feet (1.8 m) long, so imagine how long the DNA from an onion cell would be!

The DNA molecule is often compared to a book. The DNA bases (A, C, T, and G) form words called genes. The genes contain all sorts of information necessary for life. DNA is found in every living cell (at least that we know of). It is like a recipe book providing information for building and running the organism. Because each organism needs different information, the arrangement of DNA varies in each individual. Human DNA must contain information to make brains and eyeballs, while plant DNA provides information to make leaves and roots (such as onions). (6)

What’s Not Evolution?

Darwinism: all life on earth has come about through descent with modification from a single common ancestor (a hypothetical, primitive, single-celled organism).

Darwinism and Darwin Evolution used in correct context is defined as meaning “descent with modification from a common ancestor” or in other words (molecules-to-man evolution). Darwinism has never been observed.

What is Evolution?

The terms evolving and evolution used in correct context is defined as meaning “adaptation” or “limited change in a population over time” which can be clearly seen today in everyday life as we observe nature and when observing bacterium, fruit flies, different breeds of dogs, cats, horses, etc. All of these forms of life can change and have changed yet they only change within their form of life meaning that bacterium will always be bacterium and fruit flies will always be flies and dogs will always be dogs, etc. You can see this in dogs the so many different breeds of dogs. Take for example a pure Labrador and Poodle. You can breed two pure Labradors together and get pure Labradors and the same with two pure Poodles and get pure Poodles. You can breed a pure Labrador and Poodle together (and just why anyone would want to do this is beyond me) and get a 50% Labrador and 50% Poodle yet this 50/50 mix is still a dog no matter how many times it is done nor for however many years it is done.

Natural Selection

Evolution (not Darwinism) in the wild happens by natural selection. Natural selection is an observable process and has been shown to change organisms but always within the boundaries of the created kinds, i.e., dogs, cats, bacterium, flies, etc. This type of change is often termed “microevolution,” and the hypothetical type of change (Darwinism) that turns fish into philosophers is known as “macroevolution.” The large-scale changes through time are simply dramatic extrapolations of the observed phenomenon of natural selection. This degree of extrapolation has no basis in operational science. There are limits to the amount and type of genetic change that can occur—no matter what amount of time is allowed. As an illustration: if you can pedal a bicycle at 10 mph, how long would it take to reach the moon? Bicycles have limits that would make this goal impossible regardless of the time you have to accomplish it.(4)

Mutations

In the real world, mutations are responsible for a number of genetic defects, including hemophilia (bleeders’ disease), loss of protective color in the skin and eyes (albinism), and certain kinds of cancer and brain malfunction. We have abundant evidence that various kinds of radiations, errors in DNA replication, and certain chemicals can indeed produce mutations, and mutations in reproductive cells can be passed on to future generations. Mutations are certainly real. They have profound effects on our lives. And, according to the Darwinists, mutations are the raw material for Darwinism.

But is that possible? Can mutations produce real evolutionary changes? Don’t make any mistakes here. Mutations are real; they’re something we observe; they do make changes in traits. But the question remains: do they produce evolutionary changes? Do they really produce new traits? Do they really help to explain that postulated change from molecules to man, or fish to philosopher that Darwinism makes?(4)

As our understanding of genetics has improved, it has become increasingly clear that mutations + time + chance do not equal Darwinism. All observed mutations demonstrate a loss of genetic information from the genetic code, or they are neutral. Darwinism claims that the process has no direction or goal. If you look at the complexity of the “first” organism, it must be accepted that a massive amount of information has been produced to explain the variety of life we see today. Mutations cannot generate new genetic information; so they cannot be used to explain how Darwinism has proceeded from a cell with less information than is present in modern cells.(5)

How does (Darwinism) molecules-to-man have an information problem?

Information is the real heart of the problem for people who believe that life could have arisen by Darwinism. All life is built up on the basis of information. This information is contained in our DNA—the molecule of heredity. It’s like a series of letters and a code to read them.

A good comparison would be the Morse code. If you understand the code with dots and dashes representing letters of the alphabet, you can read something that’s put in Morse code.

If Darwinian evolution were true, then the very first organism had to have information in the form of letters and a code. Darwinists say that as organisms evolved, new information had to be continually added. In other words, millions of times over millions of years, new information would have to be generated by random processes and added to the genetic system.

Now here’s the clincher: No one has ever documented even just one instance of new information arising from matter by itself. All observations in science show clearly that information only comes from previously existing information, and ultimately from an intelligence. And this fits with creation—not Darwinism.

A major problem for Darwinism is the huge increase in information content of organisms through time. Darwinism accepts additions and deletions of information as evidence of evolution of a population. The problem is that through the imagined history of life on earth, the information content of the genomes of organisms must have increased dramatically.(5)

Bait and Switch

The ideas of natural selection, speciation, adaptation, and evolution are often used interchangeably by secular scientists. Many classroom textbooks also use the terms in this way. When scientists and authors use evolution to mean both “change in features over time” and “the history of life on earth,” it is difficult to know which definition is being used in each instance. This is often used as a bait-and-switch technique (equivocation). When small changes that arise as a result of the loss of information are used as evidence for molecules-to-man evolution (Darwinism), the switch has occurred.(5)

Questions to Consider

Recognizing the failure of the fossil record to display the gradual nature of Darwinian evolution, Stephen J. Gould resurrected the idea of Darwinism in big jumps known as “punctuated equilibrium.” Major remodeling of body plans could occur if regulator genes caused multiple changes at once. This would explain gaps in the fossil record, but it is not supported by observational science. Even if these creatures were born, what would they mate with?

Where did all the new information come from since mutations are known to reduce information?

Does similarity always prove that one structure evolved into another?

A large fish allows a small fish or shrimp to clean parasites from its mouth and then swims off without eating the cleaner. How could this relationship, and other irreducibly complex systems, have evolved one step at a time?

How do you select for the ability to fix a mutation that you don’t have?

How did the first organism survive without the second, and vice versa?

If you can pedal a bicycle at an average of 10 mph, how long would it take to reach the moon riding your bicycle taking a three hour break every fifth hour?

Is Darwinism a valid scientific idea since it cannot be observed in experiments and repeated to show that the conclusions it claims are valid?

What mechanisms do scientists use to explain how mutations can produce new information to make organisms more complex, when virtually all mutations cause a loss of information or no change at all?

Since information cannot be created from matter by purely natural mechanisms and since it is not a part of the material universe, how did information originate?

By what mechanism is new information added to genomes in Darwinian evolutionary history? Can the information gain be demonstrated experimentally?

What direct fossil evidence is there that fish could have evolved into amphibians? Could the alleged transitional fossils be interpreted in multiple ways?

When two lines of evidence contradict each other (e.g., if DNA suggests one Darwinian evolutionary relationship and anatomy suggests a different relationship), how do scientists decide which line of evidence is more compelling?

Why is Darwinism the key to understanding biology? Why is it necessary to know where the eye evolved from to understand how it works and how to treat it when it has a disease?

Why do examples of natural selection get equated with Darwinism when Darwinian evolution is not observable and natural selection is?

Why do biology textbooks include the photo of the peppered moth when scientists have shown it to be a fraud?

Should we accept everything that the text tells us about Darwinian evolution when the textbooks are constantly being changed and updated?

If Darwinian evolution is not directed by a purpose, would it be safe to say that human existence is purposeless?

What is the basis for truth and morality if human life is a byproduct of Darwinian evolutionary processes (random interactions of lifeless chemicals)?

Are humans more special or important than any other organism if there is no such thing as higher and lower animals in an Darwinian evolutionary framework?

Is it possible to know the original function of an organ that is called vestigial, like the appendix, when most tissues are not preserved in fossils and the ancestor cannot be examined? It would seem that there are many assumptions involved in making such a claim.

Does Darwinian evolution predict stasis or progress? Why are so many “living fossils” found that have remained the same for hundreds of millions of years while other species have evolved relatively rapidly?

There seem to be many different definitions of evolution; do all scientists agree on what evolution is? Which view of evolution is correct (punctuated equilibrium, neo-Darwinism, Darwinism, etc.)?

Why do scientists consider homologous structures evidence of a common ancestor when they seem to fit the expected pattern, but scientists call them examples of convergent evolution when they don’t fit the pattern?

What types of evidence would Darwinists accept as evidence against Darwinism?

Is “Just give it enough time and it will happen.” a scientific statement?

Historical Background on the Discovery of Natural Selection

Many people give credit to Charles Darwin for formulating the theory of natural selection as described in his book “On the Origin of Species.” Few people realize that Charles Darwin only popularized the idea and actually borrowed it from several other people, especially a creationist by the name of Edward Blyth. Blyth published several articles describing the process of natural selection in “Magazine of Natural History” between 1835 and 1837—a full 22 years before Darwin published his book “On the Origin of Species.” It is also known that Charles Darwin had copies of these magazines and that parts of “On The Origin of Species” are nearly verbatim from Blyth’s articles.(7)

Blyth, however, differed from Darwin in his starting assumptions. Blyth believed in God as the Creator, rather than the blind forces of nature. He believed that God created original kinds, that all modern species descended from those kinds, and that natural selection acted by conserving rather than originating. Blyth also believed that man was a separate creation from animals. This is especially important since humans are made in the image of God, an attribute that cannot be applied to animals (Genesis 1:27). Blyth seemed to view natural selection as a mechanism designed directly or indirectly by God to allow His creation to survive in a post-Fall, post-Flood world. This is very different from Darwin’s view. Darwin wrote, “What a book a devil’s chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low and horridly cruel works of nature.”(8)

References

1) http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v25/i4/poodles.asp

2) D. O’Leary, By Design or by Chance? Castle Quay, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, 7, 2004.

3) Eugenie C. Scott, Creation or evolution? www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/6261_creation_or_evolution__1_9_2001.asp.

4) http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch2-mutations.asp

5) http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/natural-selection-vs-evolution

6) http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v5/n3/dna-kitchen

7) J. Foard, The Darwin papers, “Edward Blyth and natural selection,” www.thedarwinpapers.com.

8) Letter from Charles Darwin to Joseph Hooker, Darwin Archives, Cambridge University, July 13, 1856.

9) http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/is-natural-selection-evolution#fnMark_1_7_1

Questions to Consider if You Believe Darwinism

Questions to Consider if You Believe Darwinism
1. Recognizing the failure of the fossil record to display the gradual nature of Darwinian evolution, Stephen J. Gould resurrected the idea of Darwinism in big jumps known as “punctuated equilibrium.” Major remodeling of body plans could occur if regulator genes caused multiple changes at once. This would explain gaps in the fossil record, but it is not supported by observational science. Even if these creatures were born, what would they mate with?

2. Where did all the new information come from since mutations are known to reduce information?

3. Does similarity always prove that one structure evolved into another?

4. A large fish allows a small fish or shrimp to clean parasites from its mouth and then swims off without eating the cleaner. How could this relationship, and other irreducibly complex systems, have evolved one step at a time?

5. How do you select for the ability to fix a mutation that you don’t have?

6. How did the first organism survive without the second, and vice versa?

7. If you can pedal a bicycle at an average of 10 mph, how long would it take to reach the moon riding your bicycle taking a three hour break every fifth hour?

8. Is Darwinism a valid scientific idea since it cannot be observed in experiments and repeated to show that the conclusions it claims are valid?

9. What mechanisms do scientists use to explain how mutations can produce new information to make organisms more complex, when virtually all mutations cause a loss of information or no change at all?

10. Since information cannot be created from matter by purely natural mechanisms and since it is not a part of the material universe, how did information originate?

11. By what mechanism is new information added to genomes in Darwinian evolutionary history? Can the information gain be demonstrated experimentally?

12. What direct fossil evidence is there that fish could have evolved into amphibians? Could the alleged transitional fossils be interpreted in multiple ways?

13. When two lines of evidence contradict each other (e.g., if DNA suggests one Darwinian evolutionary relationship and anatomy suggests a different relationship), how do scientists decide which line of evidence is more compelling?

14. Why is Darwinism the key to understanding biology? Why is it necessary to know where the eye evolved from to understand how it works and how to treat it when it has a disease?

15. Why do examples of natural selection get equated with Darwinism when Darwinian evolution is not observable and natural selection is?

16. Why do biology textbooks include the photo of the peppered moth when scientists have shown it to be a fraud?

17. Should we accept everything that the text tells us about Darwinian evolution when the textbooks are constantly being changed and updated?

18. If Darwinian evolution is not directed by a purpose, would it be safe to say that human existence is purposeless?

19. What is the basis for truth and morality if human life is a byproduct of Darwinian evolutionary processes (random interactions of lifeless chemicals)?

20. Are humans more special or important than any other organism if there is no such thing as higher and lower animals in an Darwinian evolutionary framework?

21. Is it possible to know the original function of an organ that is called vestigial, like the appendix, when most tissues are not preserved in fossils and the ancestor cannot be examined? It would seem that there are many assumptions involved in making such a claim.

22. Does Darwinian evolution predict stasis or progress? Why are so many “living fossils” found that have remained the same for hundreds of millions of years while other species have evolved relatively rapidly?

23. There seem to be many different definitions of evolution; do all scientists agree on what evolution is? Which view of evolution is correct (punctuated equilibrium, neo-Darwinism, Darwinism, etc.)?

24. Why do scientists consider homologous structures evidence of a common ancestor when they seem to fit the expected pattern, but scientists call them examples of convergent evolution when they don’t fit the pattern?

25. What types of evidence would Darwinists accept as evidence against Darwinism?

26. Is “Just give it enough time and it will happen.” a scientific statement?

Richard Dawkins Pitiless Indifference

Richard Dawkins has said; “The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.” (1)

Richard Dawkins is saying that there is no evil, no good and that we are all blind to and have pitiless indifference to what is happening around us and to our friends, family, and people everywhere.

Do you have a pitiless indifference to someone taking a puppy or kitten or baby and smashing it against a tree over and over again and again until its skull breaks and guts burst open? Do you turn a blind eye to someone for no medical reason taking your sister’s, brother’s, spouse’s, mom’, father’s, uncle’s, aunt’s, friend’s, arm and violently twisting and rippint it off at the shoulder? Do you show a pitiless indifference to someone aggressively murdering each of your family members systematically leaving you for their last victim? Would you turn a blind eye towards someone about to murder you? If you would turn a blind eye and have pitiless indifference to any of these you are evil.

Do you not have a respect and admiration for people who put their life in jeopardy to help someone they don’t even know get out of treacherous situation i.e., fire fighters, our military, and our police officers? Do you not call for justice when someone or a group of people are wronged? Do you not have respect and admiration for doctors and nurses who help people? Do you not want that everyone be healthy and live a full meaningful life? If you do any of these things you are not evil.

Thus leads us to a conclusion as to all of what Richard Dawkins said is meaningless and without merit if anyone (including you) in this world has ever not shown blind pitiless indifference to any injustice or if anyone (even you) has ever gone out of the way to help another person or animal in any way whatsoever.

1. Richard Dawkins. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved May 6, 2011, from BrainyQuote.com Web site: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/richarddaw402494.html

The Richard Dawkins Delusion - The Religion of Atheism (Conclusion)

Year before last year I read, “The God Delusion” written by Richard Dawkins. From time to time I like to read about the secular world religion of Atheism and Richard Dawkins is one of the current leading atheist evangelistic writers on Atheism so year before last year I picked his book to read. The purpose of this series of articles is a critique of the deluded book from Richard Dawkins, “The God Delusion.”

 

As I was reading Dawkins’ evangelism of Atheism through his ramblings, musings and distortions he has in his deluded book, I decided to take a few notes and do some writing of my own. This series of articles points out some of the numerous points within Dawkins’ book, “The God Delusion” that made me think the most. I hope you too start to think about truth as you read these articles.

 

This series of articles goes somewhat along with the chapters of Dawkins’ delusional book but not totally. Unless otherwise noted, all references to Richard Dawkins within this series of articles come from directly from his deluded book, The God Delusion. If you have not read Part 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of this series of articles, I suggest that you do so prior to reading its conclusion so that you have the proper background of my review of Richard Dawkins’ deluded book. The Richard Dawkins Delusion (Part 1)

 

As Richard Dawkins in his book The God Delusion, made a disclaimer, I make this disclaimer for this series of articles in unparalleled presumption of respect to Richard Dawkins and those who believe in him and in the religion of Atheism. Also, I include agnostics who in hopes of their self-proclaimed ignorance that when their time comes to be able to debate their righteousness with God based on their ignorance of enough evidence to believe. I will not go out of my way to offend any of you yet I will handle myself as a true follower of Christ Jesus and be salt of the earth in pointing you to absolute truth and the utter delusion told of in Dawkins’ book. (Matthew 5:13) (Romans 1:16)

 

How to not fall prey to the likes of Richard Dawkins

I follow Christ Jesus, I am not perfect and that God as described in the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible is the only true God that exists beyond any and all boundaries manmade or otherwise. Followers of Christ Jesus hold that the Holy Bible is the word of God and that the word of God is absolute truth. All other beliefs, gods and religions (including Atheism) are purely manmade fictional nonsense.

 

Richard Dawkins’ evangelism of Atheism is his sole purpose for his deluded book and all others he has written. Many atheists follow the religion of Atheism and many of them will not even read anything that goes against their faith in Atheism’s teachings. These atheists are so afraid to read something that goes against their believes that they close their minds, placing themselves into a little box in which they are scared to get out. In contrast, followers of Christ Jesus are actually taught to test and examine ourselves to see if we are actually in the faith. (2 Corinthians 13:5) This instruction within the Holy Bible is why I and all true followers of Christ Jesus read deluded books like Richard Dawkins’ and other books on the religion of Atheism. Unlike the atheists who are afraid to openly and honestly read something other than what their religion of Atheism teaches, true followers of Christ Jesus actually grow stronger in their faith in God by testing the truth of secular writings like those of Richard Dawkins.

 

Richard Dawkins makes prey of people who believe him by using his advanced degrees, inelegant writing and  droll remarks all the while using illogical pretenses and flat out deceptions with delusional thinking to persuade people into thinking that his “enlightened” supremacy and deluded assertions is the truth and that he has “enlightened” them with his knowledge. Richard Dawkins, believes that his prey is not smart enough (many are not) and is devoted to him enough (or at least devoted to the religion of Atheism) to not really seek out the absolute truth in the word of God.

 

Richard Dawkins uses his prey’s sinful nature to lure them deeper into believing in him by him telling them what they want to hear. Through his confusing bogus religious beliefs, mankind’s sinful nature, godless religious leaders, fallen Christian leaders, one’s own negative religious experiences, and trials and tribulations, Richard Dawkins tells his prey that they do not have to believe in God and that they can do what they please for without the existence of God, they are lead to believe that they are god over their own life.

 

I encourage you to test your faith in Atheism and to seek the absolute truth for yourself and to not just take Richard Dawkins nor for that matter my word for the existence of God. Within the actual articles, numerous are listed which can establish your quest of knowledge of the absolute truth. It is your choice to make. It is only your choice to make on the acceptance of God or not; this is the only choice that really matters in your life whether or not you think it matters.

 

I encourage you to not fall prey to the likes of Richard Dawkins whether you continue to read my articles or not. Do your own honest research into God’s existence and to not just take anyone’s word for it but to seek the light of absolute truth for yourself. (John 1:5) I know that many of you will not heed my encouragement. I respect your decision either way although I may not agree with the choice you make. The day will come that your choice will really matter and I want your day to come with you properly prepared for eternal life. (Romans 6:23)

 

The god Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins professes his most distaste and vilest vindictive expressions against the existence of and utters his upmost philosophical declarations in hostile opposition to the one true God described in the Old Testament because Richard Dawkins knows that God exists. God allows Richard Dawkins to do as he pleases because God has given each of us a free will to do what we want to do and the freedom to do what we want to do on earth. God does not interfere with our free will. (1 Peter 2:15-17)

 

Richard Dawkins uses intimidation to create shame in his prey to deter them from thinking for themselves. He does this to delude his prey into staying in the mind bog he set up for them so that they will ask of him for more of his enlightenment and not venture out on their own and actually find the truth. You can ignore Richard Dawkins intimidation tactics and escape the swamp and actually find the truth for yourself because you are not a fool for you know that you can search for the truth on your own. (2 Timothy 2:22-25)

 

We know that Richard Dawkins said he is not an atheist. He is only making a personal assumption about God’s nonexistence. He is really an agnostic; meaning that he says he doesn’t know one way or another about God’s existence. Richard Dawkins in his own words also said that one cannot disprove God. From these facts you have learned that you can and should search for the truth yourself. You now know that you do not have to take someone else’s personal assumption as your belief because you can research the truth and make a well informed decision on your own to believe in God.

 

Apathy and procrastination are not good ways to find the truth. One needs to find the truth and accept it before one’s time is up. You know that it is only your choice to make and that no one else can make if for you because this choice is solely your personal responsibility.

 

God gave us our free will and we can suppress it and follow God’s will if we choose to do so. We are to forgo our following our free will because we are not perfect and God is. God only wants what is best for us and has our best interests in His will because He loves us. God does not tempt anyone; all temptation comes from Satan. It is very important to forgive those who have wronged us because this allows God to forgive us.

 

It’s hard to not make fun of Richard Dawkins’ great crane god with its hoisting apparatus supported on an overhead track fulfilling the evolutionary needs of all in time. It all reads like a very poor B rated science fiction book that only a moron would believe is true.

 

Arguments for Richard Dawkins’ Non Existence

A consistent occurrence within his deluded book is the nonexistence of Richard Dawkins’ placement of any facts in his writings. Richard Dawkins is playing you for a fool if you believe him in that he is betting that you will not follow up with your own research to find the truth he left out of his writings. Richard Dawkins through his convoluted style of writing and infantile rants doesn’t care about you nor does he want you to make a well informed decision for your choice to accept God. Richard Dawkins only wants you to take his biased personal assumption as your own. The reason Richard Dawkins wants you to do this is because he wants to keep his prey (you if you think his writings are truth) in its place and his supremacy over it.

 

Richard Dawkins is afraid to debate his personal assumption. Tactics used by Richard Dawkins and his kind to delude their prey, taint all evidence, and degrade those who do not believe them so to impose their biased personal assumption upon their prey to reign over them.

 

The Holy Bible has more manuscript support than any other work of classical history. You know that the four books of the New Testament which makes up the Gospels^[1]; Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John that tell the historical story of Jesus Christ. The books Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are included in the New Testament because each writer was an eye witness to the life, death and resurrection of Jesus and their writings occurred not long after Jesus’ death and resurrection. The New Testament was written before AD 70 (well within the ages of those people who actually saw and experienced Jesus’ teachings, death and resurrection). The non-canonical gospels (false writings) not in the Holy Bible were left out because of doubt over their authorship, the time frame between the original writing and the events described, or content that was at odds with orthodoxy. The Holy Bible is God’s Holy word.

 

A personal experience with God is not a hallucination. God is real and millions of people have a personal relationship with Him. God does not ever go against His Holy word and so will not ever tell anyone to commit a sin of any kind. A personal experience with God is in line with the Holy Bible teachings. It is very important for you to know and understand the Holy Bible so that you will not fall as prey to perverted trickery and deceitful teachings about it.

 

When I have personal struggles, I find strength through God to overcome them. Prayer creates a personal relationship with God and I have used prayer to help me get through most of the trials and tribulations I have experienced in my life. My letting go of my selfishness helped me gain a closer personal relationship with God. I still struggle with my selfishness (as do you if you are honest with yourself) and I gain strength from God to overcome the temptations of it each day.

 

Only God is perfect and neither you nor I nor anyone else is perfect. Through our personal responsibility we are to care for those who cannot take care of themselves. God allows pain and suffering to give us opportunity to grow our character to be stronger. Being a Christian, people will hate you just because they want to hate you because you have placed your faith in Christ Jesus. We (Christians) are free to do what we want to do and we are supposed to do God’s will and not what our free will wants us to do. God’s will for us is that we are to do what is right which is what we should do.

 

You have a choice to make and that choice is only your choice to make. You need to make this choice for yourself. Remember, not making the choice is making the choice of not following Christ Jesus. You are no matter what you may think personally responsible for each and every choice you make including the choices you do not make but should have made. All choices have consequences; good choices have consequences, bad choices have consequences, and the lack of making a choice in the case of truly and honestly searching for the absolute truth has eternal consequences. You alone are responsible for all of your choices.

 

God Yes, Cranes No

After much ranting through four chapters within his deluded book, Richard Dawkins came to his main conclusion here stated in non-deluded words, that God may truly exist. Through Richard Dawkins’ writing that natural selection uses “luck of the gaps” in order to work. Through luck of the gaps, natural selection uses massive infusions of sheer luck in order to do its thing without any quantitative value.

 

Would you bet your life on the chance that luck will save you. This is the ultimate choice that you must make for yourself and you are the only one who can make this choice for yourself because it is your responsibility to make for yourself. Are you going to bet your life on luck saving you by chance?

 

There are no gaps to fill with God as He has created us, all that we can see and know and has created all that we will ever see and know about in our finite understanding within our finite lifetime on earth. You cannot make someone love you. God loves you and wants you to love Him and so He gave to you a free will to love Him if you chose to do so. God will not impede upon your free will to choose to love him or not and that he has ingeniously given to us subtle clues to his existence (Physics, Gravity, Logic, Reason, etc. are all parts of His invisible attributes Romans 1:20) and the Holy Bible for us to know him. Life is not based on luck. Richard Dawkins and his kind delude you with the word, arbitrary.

 

Darwinism’s natural selection actually dulls one’s consciousness. Darwinism natural selection works through major infusions of luck and it uses luck of the gaps to get by. Darwinism’s natural selection process up “Mount Improbable” through all the lucky numbers and eons of time and efforts it takes natural selection to luckily come out with pesky Dawkins Selfish Charms defining The Mount Improbable Follies complexities of using infusions of massive amounts of major infusions of sheer luck to create and sustain life. Darwinism’s luck of the gaps would not most likely make a good TV series even if it was luckily hooked up with scientology. Think about this; if life came from abiogenesis randomness how can we have rational and logical thought?

 

The Religion of Atheism

The attitudes, commitment and devotion one has to being an atheist based on a set of institutionalized system of beliefs and practices give cause, principle, and a system of beliefs held to with faith that constitutes to atheism being a religion. Realize that Richard Dawkins being at the top of the atheist religious hierarchy is leading the discharge of atheist diarrhea taking the religion of Atheism into new evangelistic heights through his deluded personal biased assumption and deluded writings. Richard Dawkins deems himself the god of atheism as does his prey, the disciples of atheist religion.

 

Countless examples of atheist diarrhea which went on back in 2008 and there are now more going on today. Be aware of what is going on right now as you are reading this article and will understand atheist diarrhea is becoming an everyday occurrence and you will know it when you see it in the future for what it really is; a personal bias against God. Atheist diarrhea misstates the “United States Declaration of Independence as saying that there should be a separation of church and state when in fact, it clearly states; that there should not be any national or state religion established which gives everyone freedom to the religion of their choice. Atheists want their religion of Atheism as the only religion followed.

 

You now know that God’s existence is not based on religion. Just like the game of baseball is not the baseball; a religion may be based on God but God is not a religion. Remember one of the primary lessons Jesus taught while He was here on earth; no one can get into Heaven through their good deeds nor by working to get there by following a religion can anyone get into Heaven. What Jesus is saying is that God in Heaven is not a religion, God is God.

 

As we can gather from the atheist diarrhea, atheists are a lonely set of people who have nothing to live for but the present-day. Being such a set of lonely people, they long to have companionship but they chose to believe that having a companionship doesn’t include God as they make a personal assumption that God does not exist and often rule out anything that points to God’s existence. This is the root of an atheist’s lonesomeness, the absence of allowing God into their life. Without inclusion of God in the atheist’s life, the atheist is choosing to forgo the companionship of God and is choosing to not accept the gift of love (Jesus) God offers to each of us. Remember, when a gift is offered to you, it is up to you to accept it or not. God is freely offering to you the gift of His love via His only begotten son, Christ Jesus. God wants you to freely accept Christ Jesus as your savior by placing your faith into Him and following His ways.

 

Richard Dawkins is Delusional

Let’s think about this for a moment; Richard Dawkins and many others like him, go on a crusade attacking something they say is a fairytale. How rational would it for someone to express by writing numerous books, speaking at conferences, and making TV appearances all focused on demeaning and attacking the Tooth Fairy?

 

In reality however, Richard Dawkins and those like him know full well that God exists yet they are desperately trying to justify their unbelief with their pity attacks. Richard Dawkins and his kind are fulfilling the words of Romans 1 . They are suppressing the truth in unrighteousness (Romans 1:18). They do not like to retain the knowledge of God in their thinking (Romans 1:28). Their foolish hearts have been darkened and their thinking is futile (Romans 1:21). They claim to be wise but have become fools (Romans 1:22). My prayer to God for them is that they will honestly seek the truth before it’s too late for them to do so.

---

[1] Gospel means good news.

The Five Commandments of Atheism (Part 1)

The Five Commandments of Atheism

This is the first of a six part series of articles that discuss the Five Commandments of Atheism. For well over a year I have been studying the religion of Atheism. During this time, I have found that there are five clear aspects of Atheism which atheists follow. I call these five aspects, “The Five Commandments of Atheism.” This first article is an introduction of The Five Commandments of Atheism. In the subsequent articles I will expound upon each of the five commandments of Atheism.

 

 Yes, atheists have a set of five commandments that they follow. Like all religions there’s a code of conduct within the atheist religion, Atheism. Just as not every Christian follows the ten commandments to perfection, not every atheist follows their five commandments to perfection. Given enough time however, the majority of atheists do ensue each one more faithfully the longer they denounce God. (Isaiah 47:10)

 

 Many atheists do not even know that there is a set of five atheist commandments that they follow yet they follow them just the same. Atheists are able to follow the atheist commandments so well because they do their best to exclude God from their life in each and every way that they can. With their continuing efforts of exclusion of God from their lives, atheists have five atheist commandments that they follow which allows them to be atheists. In this series of articles, you will be exposed to the religion of Atheism’s commandments and how they each came about. (Romans 1:16-17)

 

 Atheism’s Five Commandments

Atheists think that if they could just get everyone who believes in God to not do so or to at least say that they do not do so just to appease them, that they (the atheist) would be able to not think about God. This not thinking about God however is impossible for anyone to do because God has wired us to think about Him. Atheists go to great lengths to get God out of their life. They go to such great lengths that they ignore the abundance of evidence all around which points to God. Atheists’ trying to not think about God and ignoring the evidence of God is their number one commandment: Suppress the Truth (Romans 1:18)

 

 In their suppressing the truth atheists have come up with some of the stupidest things to think about to divert their thoughts about God. Things like Darwinism and its little whooping cranes Richard Dawkins is so find of for example. Being a topic that has no supporting evidence whatsoever, Darwinism demands the likes of Richard Dawkins in his book, “The God Delusion” to ramble along with his musings, misquotes, half facts, and not to mention the multitudes of infusions of sheer luck to just keep Darwinism from going the way of the dodo bird. An atheist’s effort to suppress the truth with such vigor takes a great deal of time and thought and brings us to the atheist’s second commandment: Futile Thinking (Romans 1:21)

 

 With their efforts to suppress the truth through their futile thinking, a lot of atheistic competition takes place amongst the stated atheists who are supposedly smarter than the average atheist and in their mind, and holding that they are also in their minds compared to a Christian, an absolute genius. The atheistic competition between the atheist elites to become “the one” who can best come up with more ways to suppress the truth through futile thinking has created a small set of atheist gurus who have a huge following of atheists and extremely huge overbearing egos such as Richard Dawkins. Atheists like Richard Dawkins and his kind are placed on pedestals in deity status by mere atheists. Richard Dawkins and his kind accept and live for this divinity recognition. Richard Dawkins and his kind along with the atheist holiest being of all, Charles Darwin, brings us to the third atheist commandment: Idolatry of anything other than the one true God of all Creation (Romans 1:22-25)

 

 The fourth atheist commandment is one that not all atheists adhere to but if they are a true atheist has nothing against anyone from doing it. The fourth atheist commandment can also be applicable to telling the truth and other moral matters like rape and murder. A true atheist states that no absolute grounds exists against lying, sex outside of marriage, murder, slander, pornography, stealing, etc. Atheists already suppress the truth; lying. Atheists are often not against marriage but are okay with a man and woman living together. Atheists are also often pro-choice for abortion; murder. Atheists are often okay with slander as long as the slander is pointed at someone who follows Christ Jesus. Again, the fourth atheist commandment is one which is not fully followed by all atheists but given enough time much of it is and if the person holds himself or herself as a true atheist, there is no absolute standard for morality. The fourth atheist commandment is: Immorality (Romans 1:26-27)

 

 Atheists suppressing the truth through their futile thinking while worshiping their idols like Richard Dawkins living an immoral life by evangelizing their atheist diarrhea gives way to the fifth and final atheist commandment. The fifth atheist commandment strikes each and every atheist each time that they open their mouth to spew their diarrhea to bring someone who does believe in God. When an atheist tries to persuade someone to not believe in God using their suppressed truth, futile thinking, idolatry ridden immoral diarrhea, they have directly opened up and have shown the world their fifth commandment: Insanity (Romans 1:28-32) (Ecclesiastes 9:3) 

 

 

  

Isaiah 47:10 (New International Version)

You have trusted in your wickedness and have said, 'No one sees me.' Your wisdom and knowledge mislead you when you say to yourself, 'I am, and there is none besides me.'

 

  

Romans 1:16-32 (New International Version)

 ¹⁶I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. ¹⁷For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."

 

 ¹⁸The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, ¹⁹since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

 

²⁰For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

 

 ²¹For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. ²²Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools ²³and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

 

 ²⁴Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. ²⁵They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

 

²⁶Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.

 

²⁷In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

 

 ²⁸Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.

 

²⁹They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,

 

³⁰slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;

 

³¹they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

 

³²Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.

 

 

Ecclesiastes 9:3 (New American Standard)

This is an evil in all that is done under the sun, that there is one fate for all men. Furthermore, the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil and insanity is in their hearts throughout their lives. Afterwards they go to the dead.

 

 

 

Diarrhea

2 : excessive flow <verbal diarrhea>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/diarrhea

 

 

Getting Proof You want of God's Existence

The Richard Dawkins Delusion - The Religion of Atheism (Part 5)

Richard Dawkins and those who believe in him are truly, DELUSIONAL (Part 5)

Year before last year I read, “The God Delusion” written by Richard Dawkins. From time to time I like to read about the secular world religion of Atheism and Richard Dawkins is one of the current leading atheist evangelistic writers on Atheism so year before last year I picked his book to read. The purpose of this series of articles is a critique of the deluded book from Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion.

 

As I was reading Dawkins’ evangelism of Atheism through his ramblings, musings and distortions he has in his deluded book, I decided to take a few notes and do some writing of my own. This series of articles points out some of the numerous points within Dawkins’ book, “The God Delusion” that made me think the most. This series of articles goes somewhat along with the chapters of Dawkins’ delusional book but not totally. Unless otherwise noted, all references to Richard Dawkins within this series of articles come from directly from his deluded book, The God Delusion. If you have not read Part 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this series of articles, I suggest that you do so prior to reading Part 5 so that you have the proper background for where Part 5 picks up in my review of Richard Dawkins’ deluded book. The Richard Dawkins Delusion (Part 1)

 

As Richard Dawkins in his book The God Delusion, made a disclaimer, I make this disclaimer for this series of articles in unparalleled presumption of respect to Richard Dawkins and those who believe in him and in the religion of Atheism. Also, I include agnostics who in hopes of their self-proclaimed ignorance that when their time comes to be able to debate their righteousness with God based on their ignorance of enough evidence to believe. I will not go out of my way to offend any of you yet I will handle myself as a true follower of Christ Jesus and be salt of the earth in pointing you to absolute truth and the utter delusion told of in Dawkins’ book. (Matthew 5:13) (Romans 1:16)

The Religion of Atheism

Jesus went out, along with His disciples, to the villages of Caesarea Philippi; and on the way He questioned His disciples, saying to them, "Who do people say that I am?" And He summoned the crowd with His disciples, and said to them, "If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me. "For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and the gospel's will save it. "For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul? "For what will a man give in exchange for his soul? "For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels." (Mark 8:27, 34-38)

Evangelism of an Atheist Religion

The attitudes, commitment and devotion one has to being an atheist based on a set of institutionalized system of beliefs and practices give cause, principle, and a system of beliefs held to with faith that constitutes to atheism being a religion. Atheism is a religion and it is being evangelized as much if not even more so than some other man made religions and in many cases is today being evangelized more than Christianity. Yes the atheist religion is being evangelized. You don’t think being an atheist is a religious endeavor? You think that atheists are not doing any evangelism to spread their atheist view? If you are thinking that atheism is not being evangelized you are flat out totally wrong. Remember back in part one of this series of articles I told you that atheism is a man-made religion. I was not joking when I told you that atheism is a religion and now I’m telling you that it is being evangelized as a system of beliefs to hold onto with ardor and faith.

 

Richard Dawkins is leading the way in spreading the religion of Atheism. Through his books, interviews, and public speaking, no one has evangelized the atheist religion based on the follies of Darwin as much as Richard Dawkins has in his lifetime. The atheist crusades that are going on today push the atheist religion into the faces of non-atheists is becoming more and more militant and at the inception of most of them is Richard Dawkins. If I read Richard Dawkins properly, and I believe I do, he will be pushing his atheist religious practices even more so in the coming years. He yearns for the increase of power over more prey which he achieves through more atheist disciples putting their faith in his deluded books based on his personal assumption.

 

With him being at the top of the atheist religious hierarchy leading atheism through his deluded personal biased assumption and deluded writings, Richard Dawkins deems himself the god of atheism as does his prey, the disciples of atheist religion. The power hungry Richard Dawkins will in the future solicit his prey to hold more and more crusades and he will evangelize the atheist religion with new his deluded books, interviews and public appearances to build more power over his prey and to bring into his fold more disciples to build his dominion.

 

The very religious evangelism that Richard Dawkins writes against in his deluded books and talks against in his interviews and public appearances, he does with zeal in his deluded books, interviews and public appearances to evangelize atheist religion. When he goes about asking others who believe in him to do the same, so to create more atheist disciples, he is calling for atheist religious evangelism crusades. Again and again Richard Dawkins deludes his prey as he slights them with his words against following a religion only to persuade them into becoming a religious disciple following his delusional words in his religion based solely on his assumption. What a hypocrite Richard Dawkins is in his preaching one thing and his going against it with his actions. This reminds me of the Jim Jones cult which I told you about in part one of this series of articles.^[1] Remember the outcome of Jonestown?^[2] The outcome of Richard Dawkins atheist evangelism is by far worse to those who fall prey to it. You deserve more than a Richard Dawkins biased personal assumption to base your faith.(1 Corinthians 1:18)

 

To my knowledge a proper name or title does not exist for the atheist religious evangelism crusades and the spreading of the atheist faith. Many proclaimed atheists do not think they are spreading religion due to it not having a proper name or title and thus they think it isn’t a religion. Nor have the proclaimed atheists given any thought to how much faith they actually put into their false beliefs and misguided notions because most of them don’t have a clue to the truth as they only follow blindly someone to whom they have placed their faith in such as them putting it into Richard Dawkins and his personal biased assumption and delusions. My how some people will follow the stupidest of stupid without checking for themselves the truth so that they can make an informed decision on the truth based on solid facts and not sheer luck. Some of them call themselves a skeptic yet they have not even honestly researched the truth for themselves. What copouts most atheists and agnostics are when it comes to religion and truth especially when there’s not a name associated for them to remember.

 

Throughout the rest of this series of articles, for atheist religious evangelism crusades and the spreading the atheist faith I will use (Darwinian Irritants Are Ranting Rampants Having Eternal Apathy) as a metaphor for it. To keep it simple I will use the acronym “DIARRHEA” in lower case to refer to atheist religious evangelism crusades and the spreading of the atheist faith. This seems quite fitting as the recent abnormal increase in frequency of atheists pushing their atheist religion upon everyone is proving that they are irritants eternally rampant on spreading Darwinian apathy which is very similar to someone spewing diarrhea when one is sick with intestinal flu or other illness which causes loss of control of one’s bowel movement.

 

There are countless examples of atheist diarrhea going on right now as I am writing this article and many others before I started and more planned I’m sure. I’m going to inform you of just a few of the current ones as I’m writing so you can see just how far the atheists are going with pushing their atheist religion upon others and so that you can be aware of atheists spewing diarrhea when you see it next. You will find that atheist diarrhea is intended to bring more disciples into having faith in the atheist religion and that they demean religions other than their own and mainly they focus their atheist diarrhea towards Christians. If you research the inception of atheist diarrhea, often you will find the infamous hypocrite Richard Dawkins at the source of the diarrhea spewing hatred specifically pointed towards Christians and the God described in the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible.

 

In an Associated Press news wire dated Thursday, October 23, 2008 column named, “’Atheists Plan Anti-God Ad Campaign on Buses’” informed that the sides of 30 of London's red buses will carry ads with the slogan, "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life." These nonbelievers state that they are in a fight they say is the preferential treatment given to religion in British society. The organizers of this ad campaign received more than $113,000 in donations, almost seven times their target, in the hours since they launched the project on a charity Web site. Supporters include Oxford University biologist Richard Dawkins, who donated $9,000. The plan was to run the ads for four weeks starting in January 2009, but so much money was raised that the project may be expanded. Comedy writer Ariane Sherine, who started the campaign, came up with the idea after seeing a series of Christian posters on London buses. "I thought it would be a really positive thing to counter that by putting forward a much happier and more upbeat advert, saying 'Don't worry, you're not going to hell,'" said Sherine, 28. "Atheists believe this is the only life we have, and we should enjoy it." (Has it ever occurred to Sherine that she is wrong in her atheist belief on life? The non-deluded version of the ad being placed on the busses states that God may truly exist and if God does exist then there is life after death and per the New Testament within the Holy Bible the acceptance of God’s only son Jesus is the only path into Heaven. Wouldn’t it be better to investigate for yourself the truth of God so that you can make a well informed decision for yourself rather than just take a deluded slogan from the side of a bus for your faith placement? My faith is placed into the fact of God of the Holy Bible and not a deluded bus slogan. Where have you placed your faith?)

 

In an Associated Press news wire dated Tuesday, November 11, 2008 column named, “'Why Believe in a God? Just be Good'” told about The American Humanist Association putting on an ad campaign costing $40,000 proclaiming, "Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness' sake," The ads were set to run from mid-November through December 2008. Targeting children, the lyrics from "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" was used. Fred Edwords, spokesman for the humanist group said, "We are trying to reach our audience, and sometimes in order to reach an audience, everybody has to hear you. Our reason for doing it during the holidays is there are an awful lot of agnostics, atheists and other types of non-theists who feel a little alone during the holidays because of its association with traditional religion." (If atheists, agnostics and non-theists feel a little alone during the holidays, why don’t they open up to the truth and true love of God? Also April 1^st is set aside as a holiday in the U.S.A. to which atheists can claim and set traditional to their own spew of diarrhea so to have a holiday that they can have as their own for their celebration of nothingness. At least Fred is right in his holding his belief as atheist being a religion when he said in regard to their feeling alone compared to, “…traditional religion.” Also, who’s standard of “goodness” should be used for goodness sake?)

 

Atheist’s diarrhea is even making it onto national television more and more often. Bill O'Reilly on the “O’Reilly Factor” broadcasted on the Fox News channel in December 2008, that at the state capital building in Olympia, Washington, atheists placed an anti-religious plaque of their own alongside Christmas and other December holiday displays. Here is a prime example of atheists spewing atheist diarrhea and hatred against those who have faith in God and saying instead that people should follow the religion of Atheism. Bill O’Reilly said that it is very disrespectful to have anyone place alongside Christmas and other religious holiday displays of the season giving thanks to God such a blatant display of atrocity and that the atheist doing such an act is not a free speech issue. He went on to say that if the atheists had for example, put up a picture of Charles Darwin (I’m sure Richard Dawkins would have preferred his own picture) it would not been such a deliberate attempt to disrespect Christians and others with their holiday plaque of atheist diarrhea disrespects. (The atheist plaque being placed alongside Christmas displays is the first direct attempt I am aware of where atheists are actually trying to overtake Christmas and replace it with their atheist religion. I predict that in the coming years that atheist diarrhea will become much more militant in efforts of taking over Christmas as atheists are afraid of the truth, hate those who know the truth and feel that they need to overcome the truth by any means. Being that the atheist religion is not based on any foundation of morality other than that of mere man, atheists have no limits in their being able to validate (at any cost) whatever it is that they say is truth (even when there is no support for it) which is that God must go to provide the best for everyone because they will say, that God is the root of all evil.)

 

There was even a push by atheists prior to the January 2009 Presidential Inauguration to have the newly elected President of the United States of America to not use the Holy Bible to swear into office! The main atheist spewing this diarrhea says that he feels offended by the fact that the Holy Bible has been used to swear in each and every previous President of the United States and that it must stop to establish the separation of church and state noted in the Constitution of the United States of America. Here’s a news flash, God is not a church. The Christian Church is a set of people who follow the teachings of Jesus and is also a name for the place of worship. Since God is not a religion nor is God a church, there is no foundation for this atheist diarrhea. The inauguration went on as planned and scheduled using the very same bible used to swear in President Abraham Lincoln making this inauguration the second having used this bible.

 

Another news flash to many atheists is that there is no such thing in the Constitution of the United States^[3] that says there should be a separation of church and state yet the atheists daily shout their diarrhea that there is and thus evangelize to make it so that people who willingly want to worship God cannot do so. The Constitution of the United States in the First Amendment says that there should not be any national or state religion established. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.^[4]” Atheist religion evangelization uses a deluded interpretation of the First Amendment within their atheist diarrhea which they spout out over and over again and have done so for so long that many people actually think that the atheist diarrhea is what the First Amendment says. These people believing the atheist diarrhea have fallen into the atheist septic tank of diarrhea because they were not bright enough to have actually checked on the facts of what the First Amendment actually says.

 

Remember why the people who first came to America came to America in the first place?  They came here to worship God in a way that they felt was proper which they were not allowed to do in England. What was the United States of America founded upon? In the “United States Declaration of Independence^[5]” it says that the United States of America is founded upon God. Look it up for yourself to prove that I’m right or wrong. You will be surprised to find that so many people think the Constitution of the United States and the “United States Declaration of Independence actually says what the atheist diarrhea says it does. Atheist diarrhea has been deep in deluding people with misinterpretations of these documents so to get their way. So many people are gullible and fall into the atheist septic tank of diarrhea to become prey to people like Richard Dawkins and his kind because they do not confirm what they hear to see if it is true or not.

 

To where has the tolerance atheists so fondly say they have gone? To the point it ever was, it has gone into evangelism of atheistic diarrhea so to multiply the number of atheist disciples following after an assumption such as the one of Richard Dawkins. Atheists have said that they feel lonely and through their actions show that they are longing to have their own holidays and holiday traditions for their atheist religion. Atheists want to push out all religions except their atheist religion and through their atheist diarrhea push their faith into the faces of non-atheists. Atheists want their religion to be recognized not just as legitimate; atheists want their atheist religion to be the only religion practiced. Atheists not only want their atheist religion to be the only religion in the United States of America, they want their atheist religion to be the only religion in the world.

 

Richard Dawkins is leading the discharge of atheist diarrhea with his writings especially with his deluded book, “The God Delusion” as well as through his public speaking and teachings. Another following closely after Richard’s diarrhea is Christopher Hitchens who has stated that he thinks “all religious belief is sinister and infantile and belongs to the backward childhood of the race.”^[6] I guess Christopher didn’t think about atheist diarrhea and how he is evangelizing atheism religion through his diarrhea so to spread his religious practices seeing that he considers himself as an anti-theist instead of just a meager atheist.^[7] Through people like these discharging atheist diarrhea within their rambling speeches and books, the evangelistic movement of the atheist religion, Atheism, is spewed in the schools of education at all levels all around the world. Atheist spewing their diarrhea is allowed in while other beliefs, especially Christian, are not allowed in because of the atheist diarrhea ingested by so many people deluded into believing what atheist diarrhea is preaching as truth.

Imperative Deceptions

It has been mentioned before however it needs said again to make aware those who have or could fall prey to Richard Dawkins. It is crucial to all who have read or will read anything written by Richard Dawkins to understand that he makes numerous assertions and generalizations within his writings and then uses these and his assumptions to state what he calls facts which he bases on his assertions, generalizations and assumptions. Throughout his writings he rambles on while he mixes up half facts with delusions and flat out lies. Also, he often makes flat out lie blanket statements such as his asserting that we all acknowledge and accept mankind is from evolution when he writes, “Knowing that we are products of Darwinian evolution.^[8]” There is no evidence to show that we or anything else is from any kind of Darwinian evolution. If there was solid evidence of Darwinian evolution, it would be everywhere yet it is not and there is not. We are not from any kind of Darwinian evolution. God created us.

 

Richard Dawkins does this to bring his uneducated prey closer into his grasp as nothing has been proven that anything has ever came from nor that anything could come from Darwinian evolution. Darwinian evolution is a deluded 19^th century theory which would be vanquished if people would open their eyes to the truth to see how silly it is to base one’s faith on something unproven without evidence to prove it and through Richard Dawkins’ own words is based on sheer luck and needs multitudes of infusions of luck to continue to exist. The only reason it has lasted as long as it has is that it is the best alternative to the one true God that there is for people who do not want to accept God. Through Darwinism those who do not want to accept God can justify their bias against God and not give God credit for all His creation. It is the core for atheist religion as it gives those who do not want to accept God an explanation for creation other than God though be Darwinism an extremely frail explanation for creation which has no evidence to found its assertions.

 

Darwinian evolution only survives through the diarrhea Richard Dawkins and his kind spew in their quests to become the ultimate authorities and beholders of supremacy over their prey to help quench their thirst for more and more power over the prey which falls to them. Their attempts to belittle God go further with each effort they put forward and the deceptions through their false teachings reach further and further through false assumptions and delude more and more of those who do not think for themselves thus fall prey to them. Through their continuing to come up with and explain new theories (science fiction) of how Darwinism may have happened, their assertions of these conjurings as truth even without the slightest evidence and their doing so with such vengeance against God, those who have an adversity to God jump on as it is the flow easy for them to follow.

 

Within his books, Richard Dawkins goes deeper into thought on his assertions and generalizations to make unfounded profound statements of fact while using blanket statements along with mixed up half facts, delusions and lies based on his assumptions and assertions. To these unfounded profound rambling statements of fact from Richard Dawkins along with other Darwinian beliefs comes the atheist religion to which he spews diarrhea and encourages others to spew too so to grow the atheist congregation Richard Dawkins so longs to rule.

Psychologically Primed for God

In his quest to delude his prey, Richard Dawkins sets out to explain where religion comes from and why it is that people favor one religion over another religion. To all reading this series of articles, please recall that religion in any form does not have anything to do with God’s existence. God’s existence is not based on religion. Think about this for a moment. If God was based on religion, where is God in the atheist religion? Exactly, God is not in the atheist religion as God is outside of all religions. A religion may be based on God but God is not the religion. Think of it this way. The game of baseball is not the baseball. The game of baseball is based on the baseball but the baseball is not the game of baseball. One of the primary lessons Jesus taught while He was here on earth was that no one can get into Heaven through the good deeds nor by following a religion perfectly can one get into Heaven. What Jesus is saying is that God in Heaven is not a religion.

 

As I informed you in part one of this series of articles, God described in the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible is the only one true God. The Holy Bible is the word of God. The word of God is absolute truth. God is love and all true love comes from God. God infinitely loves each and every one of us. Yes, God loves you even if you do not love him. Remember, God is love. Also, God is way beyond our full comprehension.

 

All other beliefs, gods and religions (including atheism) are purely man made opinion, fictional characters and events with no core in following absolute truth. Although these fictional gods and religions may have been based on partial truth, a person from history and hold some moral value standards which resemble the solely one true God, they are neither a path of salvation for ones sins nor a path into Heaven. (Colossians 2:23)

 

As we can gather from the atheist diarrhea mentioned previously in this article, atheists are a lonely set of people who have nothing to live for but the present-day. Being such a set of lonely people, they long to have companionship but they chose to believe that having a companionship doesn’t include God as they make a personal assumption that God does not exist and often rule out anything that points to God’s existence. This is the root of an atheist’s lonesomeness, the absence of allowing God into their life. Without inclusion of God in the atheist’s life, the atheist is choosing to forgo the companionship of God and is choosing to not accept the gift of love (Jesus) God offers freely to each of us. The enmity towards God that the atheist chooses to displace God from their life thus causes the loneliness they experience and desperations many atheists state they have about death. The atheists who deny that they are lonely and that they do not fear death I say are liars.

 

Accepting God by freely choosing His only begotten son Jesus into one’s life fills the void of loneliness because God created each of us to yearn for His inclusion in our lives. Continuing to suppress the yearning for God’s inclusion in our lives as atheists choose to do further increases the loneliness they feel and over time bitterness against God and those who accept God begins to fill their void. Over enough time, the void is so filled with bitterness that it becomes hatred as without God who is love, there is hate. So the void of loneliness that the atheist denied validation by choosing to not accept God fills with bitter hatred. This bitter hatred creates a huge chasm and takes over the atheist’s thoughts. As time goes on these thoughts become expressions outward as the atheists spew their diarrhea primarily at those who accept the one true God and those who follow Him.

 

Agnostics have a similar void of loneliness than that of atheists due too to them choosing to suppress God in their lives. Their continuing to question God’s existence and not being open to His existence causes their void to deepen over time the longer they do not accept God. The void within agnostics over time is not filled so much with hate as it is in atheists yet is filled more with delusion helped along with the likes of Richard Dawkins and the agnostic’s lack of taking personal responsibility to find the truth. Many agnostics seem to be on the cusp of choosing God but do not have the intestinal fortitude or intellectual intellect to actually choose to do so because they do not want to take the personal responsibility of making a choice nor they do not want to make the wrong choice so they ride the fence and don’t make a choice to one side or the other. Thus this causes their void to deepen with more and more confusion and they become more susceptible to the delusional tactics of atheist diarrhea like Richard Dawkins and his kind evangelize and often fall prey to them. Those agnostics who do fall prey to atheist diarrhea then over time do begin to fill their void with hate as they make their choice to become atheists and get caught up in the atheist diarrhea.

 

Many agnostics who are not on the cusp of choosing God are often agnostics who have in their past had accepted God yet for some reason have allowed themselves to become deluded. Many of these agnostics became deluded about God through their lack of Holy Bible study and understanding of the truth. Those agnostics who have not studied the Holy Bible and do not understand the truth are surprised when something tragic occurs in their life and when the answer to a prayer isn’t what they wanted or was seemingly unanswered at the time they wanted it answered or it is that they become overwhelmed with the sum of tragic events occurring within the world. It could be that they found themselves in a cult instead of an actual Christian church.^[9] To whatever it was to which they allowed themselves to become deluded the root is their lack of understanding the truth and their lack of wanting to really know the truth. The void of loneliness within these agnostics is filled with them wanting their own will to be fulfilled over God’s will. From their lack of understanding the truth brings them to question God’s will in its being divine thus with them thinking that God’s will is less than divine they begin to question God’s existence. These agnostics too can find themselves falling prey to atheist diarrhea the longer they continue to put their will and lack of understanding over God’s will and knowledge. The key to finding God is to honestly study and understand the Word of God.

 

Of agnostics not on the cusp of choosing God many have fallen prey to someone posing as a leader in Christianity which took advantage of them in some way. These agnostics may have never known God’s love but they have done some study of God’s word but have not truly studied it. They fill their void of loneliness with mistrust and therefore do not trust God or anyone else either because of the incorrect study of the Holy Bible. These agnostics had placed their trust into a person instead of placing their trust in God yet they hold God responsible for the break of trust they experienced with the person. These agnostics can quickly fall prey to atheist diarrhea and even evangelize atheist diarrhea as the mistrust quickly fills their void of loneliness and over time they become more and more skeptical of God and want to gain vengeance over God for the break of trust that they encountered with the person (or people) who took advantage of them. The longing for revenge over God these agnostics have often gets on a fast track to filling their loneliness void with hate as the atheist holds against God and those who follow God. Richard Dawkins I see is an example of this type of agnostic… remember Richard Dawkins childhood experience with his priest and that in his deluded book he put himself in the sixth level of his deluded scale which states that he is an agnostic that merely makes a personal assumption that, in non-deluded words, God may truly exist yet I’m just not going to acknowledge His existence.  

Part Five Summary

In this article of the series, you learned that the attitudes, commitment and devotion one has to being an atheist based on a set of institutionalized system of beliefs and practices give cause, principle, and a system of beliefs held to with faith that constitutes to atheism being a religion. You now realize that Richard Dawkins being at the top of the atheist religious hierarchy is leading the discharge of atheist diarrhea taking the religion of Atheism into new evangelistic heights through his deluded personal biased assumption and deluded writings and that Richard Dawkins deems himself the god of atheism as does his prey, the disciples of atheist religion.

 

You read a few of the countless examples of atheist diarrhea which went on back in 2008 and are now more aware of what is going on right now as you are reading this article and will understand atheist diarrhea better when you see it in the future. You have read how atheist diarrhea misstates the “United States Declaration of Independence as saying that there should be a separation of church and state when in fact, it clearly states; that there should not be any national or state religion established.

You now know that God’s existence is not based on religion. Just like the game of baseball is not the baseball; a religion may be based on God but God is not a religion. Remember one of the primary lessons Jesus taught while He was here on earth was that no one can get into Heaven through the good deeds nor by following a religion perfectly can one get into Heaven. What Jesus is saying is that God in Heaven is not a religion.

 

As we can gather from the atheist diarrhea mentioned in this article, atheists are a lonely set of people who have nothing to live for but the present-day. Being such a set of lonely people, they long to have companionship but they chose to believe that having a companionship doesn’t include God as they make a personal assumption that God does not exist and often rule out anything that points to God’s existence. This is the root of an atheist’s lonesomeness, the absence of allowing God into their life. Without inclusion of God in the atheist’s life, the atheist is choosing to forgo the companionship of God and is choosing to not accept the gift of love (Jesus) God offers freely to each of us. Remember, when a gift is offered to you, it is up to you to accept it or not. God is freely offering to you a gift of His love via His only begotten son, Christ Jesus. God wants you to freely accept Christ Jesus as your savior by placing your faith into Him and following His ways.

Part 5 Key Words

All definitions are from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

www.merriam-webster.com

Evangelism

1: the winning or revival of personal commitments to Christ

2: militant or crusading zeal

Militant

1: engaged in warfare or combat: fighting

2: aggressively active (as in a cause): combative <militant conservationists> <a militant attitude>

crusade

1: capitalized: any of the military expeditions undertaken by Christian powers in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to win the Holy Land from the Muslims

2: a remedial enterprise undertaken with zeal and enthusiasm

Religion

1: a: the state of a religious <a nun in her 20th year of religion> b (1): the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2): commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance

2: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

3: archaic: scrupulous conformity: conscientiousness

4: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith

Diarrhea

1: abnormally frequent intestinal evacuations with more or less fluid stools

2: excessive flow <verbal diarrhea>

---

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Jones

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown

[3] http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

[5] http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence

[6] Scarborough County Transcripts for March 11, 2004 - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4515474/

[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hitchens

[8] Page 190, “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins

[9] People  October 13, 2008 – Page 101 Church or Cult? – Tony Alamo Christian Church